Having the right information can save hours of work and frustration, but a lot of this valuable knowledge is not found in textbooks, taught in classes, or easily located by searching online sources. Much of this knowledge is gained through experience and trapped in the minds and lab notebooks of people working in the world of photonics.
Thorlabs is on a mission to collect these tips, tricks, guidelines, and practical techniques into a book of knowledge we call Insights. Click on the following links or browse the tabs on this page to read the Insights we have recorded as of today. This collection is always growing, so check back soon to see what new Insights have been added.
Photonics is the study and use of light. The word photonics is based on a “photon”, which is a single particle of light. This is similar to electronics where the electrons are single particles of charge that make up electric current.
In photonics, the photons are single particles of energy that make up light. The amount of energy provided by a photon depends on the color (wavelength). For example, a laser pointer that outputs 1 mW of red (640 nm) light provides 3 x 1016 photons/s. Comparing to electronics, a power supply that provides 1 Amp of current provides 6 x 1018 electrons/s.
Light is generated by a variety of sources. Some come from nature, like the sun, fire, or bioluminescence (lightning bugs). Manufactured sources include light bulbs, LEDs, and lasers.
Much like wires are used to transport electric current, photonics uses optical fiber to transport light from one location to another.
Similar to electronics using resistors and capacitors to modify the current flow through a circuit, photonics uses optics like lenses, mirrors, and prisms to direct and modify light paths.
Almost all analysis of light is done with the same measurement equipment used in electronics, but a device is required to first convert the photons into electrical current.
Common uses for photonics are to measure distance (laser radar), transmit/receive information (telecommunications), image objects that are difficult to see by the eye alone (microscopes / endoscopes / borescopes), and create sensors such as the amount of oxygen in the blood (pulse oximeters) and the quality of the air around us (particle size and trace gas detection).
What is a procedure for correcting a laser's beam pointing angle?
Pitch (tip) and yaw (tilt) adjustments provided by a kinematic mount can be used to make fine corrections to a laser beam's angular orientation or pointing angle. This angular tuning capability is convenient when aligning a collimated laser beam to be level with respect to a reference plane, such as the surface of an optical table, as well as with respect to a particular direction in that plane, such as along a line of tapped holes in the table.
Figure 2: The beam can be aligned to travel parallel to a line of tapped holes in the optical table. The yaw adjustment on the kinematic mount adjusts the beam angle, so that the beam remains incident on the ruler's vertical reference line as the ruler slides along the line of tapped holes.
Figure 1: Leveling the beam path with respect to the surface of an optical table requires using the pitch adjustment on the kinematic laser mount (Figure 2). The beam is parallel to the table's surface when measurements of the beam height near to (left) and far from (right) the laser's front face are equal.
Video Clip 3: The pointing angle of a laser beam from a PL202 collimated laser package was corrected using the pitch (tip) and yaw (tilt) adjusters on the laser's KM100 kinematic mount, and horizontal and vertical features on a BHM1 ruler. The resulting beam travels parallel to the optical table's surface, along a line of tapped holes.
Before Using the Mount's Adjusters First, rotate each adjuster on the kinematic mount to the middle of its travel range. This reduces the risk of running out of adjustment range, and the positioning stability is frequently better when at the center of an adjuster's travel range.
Then, make coarse corrections to the laser's height, position, and orientation. This can be done by adjusting the optomechanical components, such as a post and post holder, supporting the laser. Ensure all locking screws are tightened after the adjustments are complete.
Level the Beam Parallel to the Table's Surface Leveling the laser beam is an iterative process that requires an alignment tool and the fine control provided by the mount's pitch adjuster.
Begin each iteration by measuring the height of the beam close to and far from the laser (Figure 1). A larger distance between the two measurements increases accuracy. If the beam height at the two locations differs, place the ruler in the more distant position. Adjust the pitch on the kinematic mount until the beam height at that location matches the height measured close to the laser. Iterate until the beam height at both positions is the same.
More than one iteration is necessary, because adjusting the pitch of the laser mount adjusts the height of the laser emitter. In Clip 3 for example, the beam height close to the laser was initially 82 mm, but it increased to 83 mm after the pitch was adjusted during the first iteration.
If the leveled beam is at an inconvenient height, the optomechanical components supporting the laser can be adjusted to change its height. Alternatively, two steering mirrors can be placed after the laser and aligned using a different procedure. Steering mirrors are particularly useful for adjusting beam height and orientation of a fixed laser.
Orient the Beam Along a Row of Tapped Holes Aligning the beam parallel to a row of tapped holes in the table is another iterative process, which requires an alignment tool and tuning of the mount's yaw adjuster.
The alignment tool is needed to translate the reference line provided by the tapped holes into the plane of the laser beam. The ruler can serve as this tool, when an edge on the ruler's base is aligned with the edges of the tapped holes that define the line (Figure 2).
The relative position of the beam with respect to the reference line on the table can be evaluated by judging the distance between the laser spot and vertical reference feature on the ruler. Vertical features on this ruler include its edges, as well as the columns formed by different-length rulings. If these features are not sufficient and rulings are required, a horizontally oriented ruler can be attached using a BHMA1 mounting bracket.
In Clip 3, when the ruler was aligned to the tapped holes and positioned close to the laser, the beam's edge and the ends of the 1 mm rulings coincided. When the ruler was moved to a farther point on the reference line, the beam's position on the ruler was horizontally shifted. With the ruler at that distant position, the yaw adjustment on the mount was tuned until the beam's edge again coincided with the 1 mm rulings. The ruler was then moved closer to the laser to observe the effect of adjusting the mount on the beam's position. This was iterated as necessary.
Want additional Insights on beam alignment? Watch the full video.
How are two mirrors used to align a laser beam along a different path?
The first steering mirror reflects the beam along a line that crosses the new beam path. A second steering mirror is needed to level the beam and align it along the new path. The procedure of aligning a laser beam with two steering mirrors is sometimes described as walking the beam, and the result can be referred to as a folded beam path. In the example shown in Clip 4, two irises are used to align the beam to the new path, which is parallel to the surface of the optical table and follows a row of tapped holes.
Figure 3: The beam reflected from Mirror 1 will be incident on Mirror 2, if Mirror 1 is rotated around the x- and y-axes by angles θ and ψ, respectively. Both angles affect each coordinate (x2 , y2 , z2 ) of Mirror 2's center. Mirror 1's rotation around the x-axis is limited by the travel range of the mount's pitch (tip) adjuster, which limits Mirror 2's position and height options.
Figure 4: The adjusters on the first kinematic mirror mount are tuned to position the laser spot on the aperture of the first iris.
Video Clip 4: Two mirrors in KM100 kinematic mounts route the beam from a PL202 collimated laser package along the path defined by the two IDA25 irises. The beam is aligned when halos of laser light surround each iris' aperture and the laser spot is visible on the BHM1 ruler, which was placed behind the second iris to act as a viewing screen.
Setting the Heights of the Mirrors The center of the first mirror should match the height of the input beam path, since the first mirror diverts the beam from this path and relays it to a point on the second mirror. The center of the second mirror should be set at the height of the new beam path.
Iris Setup The new beam path is defined by the irises, which in Clip 4 have matching heights to ensure the path is level with respect to the surface of the table. A ruler or calipers can be used to set the height of the irises in their mounts with modest precision.
When an iris is closed, its aperture may not be perfectly centered. Because of this, switching the side of the iris that faces the beam can cause the position of the aperture to shift. It is good practice to choose one side of the iris to face the beam and then maintain that orientation during setup and use.
Component Placement and Coarse Alignment Start by rotating the adjusters on both mirrors to the middle of their travel ranges. Place the first mirror in the input beam path, and determine a position for the second mirror in the new beam path (Figure 3). The options are notably restricted by the travel range of the first mirror mount's pitch (tip) actuator, since it limits the mirror's rotation (θ ) around its x-axis. In addition to the pitch, the yaw (tilt) of the first mirror must also be considered when choosing a position (x2 , y2 , z2 ) for the second mirror. Each coordinate of the second mirror's location has a complex dependence on both the pitch and yaw of the first mirror, as does the spacing between the two mirrors. Be sure to place the two mirrors so that neither of the first mirror's adjusters needs to be rotated all the way to either end of its travel range.
After placing the second mirror on the new beam path, position both irises after the second mirror on the desired beam path. Locate the first iris near the second mirror and the second iris as far away as possible.
While maintaining the two mirrors' heights and without touching the yaw adjusters, rotate the first mirror to direct the beam towards the second mirror. Adjust the pitch adjuster on the first mirror to place the laser spot near the center of the second mirror. Then, rotate the second mirror to direct the beam roughly along the new beam path.
First Hit a Point on the Path, then Orient The first mirror is used to steer the beam to the point on the second mirror that is in line with the new beam path. To do this, tune the first mirror's adjusters while watching the position of the laser spot on the first iris (Figure 4). The first step is complete when the laser spot is centered on the iris' aperture.
The second mirror is used to steer the beam into alignment with the new beam path. Tune the adjusters on the second mirror to move the laser spot over the second iris' aperture (Figure 5). The pitch adjuster levels the beam, and the yaw adjuster shifts it laterally. If the laser spot disappears from the second iris, it is because the laser spot on the second mirror has moved away from the new beam path.
Tune the first mirror's adjusters to reposition the beam on the second mirror so that the laser spot is centered on the first iris' aperture. Resume tuning the adjusters on the second mirror to direct the laser spot over the aperture on the second iris. Iterate until the laser beam passes directly through the center of both irises (Clip 4). If any adjuster reaches, or approaches, a limit of its travel range, one or both mirrors should be repositioned and the alignment process repeated.
If a yaw axis adjuster has approached a limit, note the required direction of the reflected beam and then rotate the yaw adjuster to the center of its travel range. Turn the mirror in its mount until the direction of the reflected beam is approximately correct. If the mirror cannot be rotated, reposition one or both mirrors to direct the beam roughly along the desired path. Repeat the alignment procedure to finely tune the beam's orientation.
If a pitch axis adjuster has approached a limit, either increase the two mirrors' separation or reduce the height difference between the new and incident beam paths. Both options will result in the pitch adjuster being positioned closer to the center of its travel range after the alignment procedure is repeated.
Want additional Insights on beam alignment? Watch the full video.
What is the required spacing between two beam-steering mirrors?
The required separation between two steering mirrors (Figure 6) depends on the slope of the beam reflected from the first mirror and the height difference between the two mirrors. Knowing the needed spacing can be important for blocking out space for a setup on a breadboard or optical table.
While it is tempting to perform a quick calculation using just the first mirror's pitch (tip) with respect to the incident beam, omitting the yaw (tilt) can result in a significant underestimate of the mirrors' required separation. In the following example, the spacing is calculated using the assumption that the entire mount is rotated around the post axis to provide yaw, while the mount's adjuster provides pitch (Figure 7). This approach is often used to initially position mirrors.
Figure 7: Instead of using the yaw adjuster, the entire mount is often rotated around the post axis (left) to provide yaw during initial positioning. This rotates the mount with respect to the global x-, y-, z-axes and the incident beam. The mount's pitch adjuster tunes the mirror's pitch (right), changing the mirror's orientation with respect to the mount's x'-, y'-, and z'-axes. The above images show a KS2 mirror mount and a RMC position-maintaining collar.
Figure 6: The first mirror reflects the incident beam towards the second mirror. The required spacing between the two depends on both the pitch and yaw of the first mirror. These KM100 mirror mounts have adjusters that can tune pitch and yaw over a ±4° range.
Figure 9: These values were calculated using the setup described in Figure 8, except that a 1° pitch angle was assumed for the first mirror. These results demonstrate that decreasing the pitch increases the required separation between the first and second mirrors. However, this may be acceptable since stability improves when the adjusters are not extended to the limits of their travel ranges.
Figure 8: In this example, the goal is to position the second mirror on the table, so that it intercepts the reflected beam when it is 0.5" lower (y2 = -0.5") than the incident beam. It is assumed the pitch on the first mirror is 4°, the maximum the mount's adjuster can provide. The entire mount is rotated around the post axis to change the first mirror's yaw. The mount's yaw adjuster is not used, since yaw angles >4° are of interest and this step does not involve fine-tuning the mirror's orientation.
Figure 10: This plot views the table's surface from above, with the first mirror (star) at the origin. Curves labeled in the legend identify a few options for positioning a second mirror on the table to intercept the beam at a height (y2) that is 0.5" lower than at the first mirror. The required separation increases significantly as the first mirror's yaw angle increases, even when its pitch angle is held constant.
Applying Yaw and Pitch Positioning beam steering mirrors is typically a two-step process. First the mirrors are placed in position and roughly oriented, then their orientations are finely tuned.
This example considers the first step and assumes different methods are used to adjust pitch and yaw. Since the required yaw angle is often too large for the mount's adjuster to provide, yaw is frequently provided by rotating the entire mount around the post axis (Figure 7, left). This changes the incident beam's angle with respect to the mount. Although the mount's yaw adjuster is not used, the pitch adjuster is used. It alters the orientation of the mirror with respect to both the incident beam and the rest of the mount (Figure 7, right).
The mirror's orientation is typically fine-tuned using the mount's pitch and yaw adjusters, without rotating the mount around the post axis. Using both adjusters has a different effect on the mirror's orientation than the approach described in this example.
Points on the Reflected Beam The first mirror's center is chosen as the origin of a fixed Cartesian coordinate system (Figure 7). The z-axis points back towards the source and is parallel to the incident beam. The y-axis is vertical and perpendicular to the table.
When the angles of rotation around the post and x'-axes are known ( and θ, respectively), points (x2, y2, z2 ) along the reflected beam can be calculated with the help of some matrix algebra (Example 2),
The variable A is a scaling factor: the larger its value, the larger the distance between the point and the mirror. In this example, the change in height (y2 ) is known and used to calculate values of x2 and z2 .
Example: Setting up Steering Mirrors These equations can be useful when positioning a pair of steering mirrors, which are used to change beam height and direction. The center of the first mirror is set at the height of the incident beam, and the center of the second mirror is set at the height of the new beam path. The second mirror must intercept the reflected beam when its height equals that of the new beam path.
For this example, both beam paths are parallel to the optical table, but the new beam path is 0.5" lower than the incident beam path. The mirrors are secured in KM100 kinematic mounts, which are attached to the tops of posts secured in post holders (Figure 6). The mounts' pitch and yaw adjusters each have a limited ±4° tuning range, which is adequate for setting the initial pitch, but not yaw, of the mirror. The yaw between the incident beam and mirror is instead changed by rotating the entire mount around the post axis, which effectively eliminates the yaw tuning range limit.
Potential x2 and z2 coordinates of the second mirror are plotted in Figure 8 for different yaw angles of the first mirror. These values were calculated using the desired height change of the new beam path (y2 = -0.5") and a pitch angle set to the maximum value (θ = 4°). While the mount provides this maximum range, note that using smaller pitch angles is recommended. Smaller angles provide the range to perform subsequent fine adjustments, as well as better stability. The effect of keeping y2 = -0.5", but reducing the pitch angle to 1° is plotted in Figure 9.
Figure 10 plots the x2 and z2 coordinates of the second mirror as positions on the optical table. The perspective is from a point directly above the table, the first mirror's position is marked by a star, and the gray circles (guides for the eye) are concentric around it. The arrows indicate selected directions of the reflected ray, each corresponding to a different yaw angle. The curves labeled in the legend were calculated for different pitch angles and a constant -0.5" change in beam height. Comparing the curves with the gray circles illustrates that the necessary separation between the two mirrors increases significantly as the yaw angle increases. Larger separations are also required when the pitch angle is reduced.
Want additional Insights on beam alignment? Watch the full video.
Figure 2: More than half the total applied force (FTotal) holds the object, since L1 > L2. The height of the left leg of this CL2 clamp is variable to compensate for the object's height. This allows the clamp's top surface and the mounting surface to be made parallel.**
Figure 1: Less than half the total applied force (FTotal) holds the object, since L1 < L2. The clamp illustrated above is the CL5A.
Clamped objects can be fairly easy to move when the torqued screw in the clamp's slot is positioned too far from the object. Correct positioning of the screw protects clamped objects from being knocked out of position.
To maximize the clamping force, position the screw as close as possible to the object.**
This works since clamps like CL5A and CL2 (Figures 1 and 2, respectively) divide the torqued screw's applied force (FTotal) between two points.
Clamping force F2 is applied to the object. The value of F2 is a percentage of FTotal and depends on L1 and L2, as described below. The remainder (F1) of the total force is applied through the opposite end of the clamp.
The following equations can be used to calculate the two applied forces.
Force Applied to Object :
Force Applied to the Other Contact Point:
These equations show that the clamping force on the object increases as the distance between the object and screw decreases. The force supplied by the torqued screw is evenly divided between F1 and F2 when L1 and L2 are equal.
**Note that maximizing the clamping force also requires both the top surface of the clamp and the area it contacts on the object to be parallel with the mounting surface, as depicted in Figures 1 and 2.
If the tangent at the interface between the clamp and object is not parallel to the mounting surface, the force applied to the object will be divided between pressing it into and pushing it across the mounting surface. The force directed along the mounting surface may, or may not, be sufficient to translate the object.
To accommodate different object heights, clamps like the CL2 have one threaded, variable-length leg, which is shown on the left in Figure 2. The number of threads between the clamp and mounting surface should be adjusted to compensate for the height of the object and to keep the clamp's top surface level with the table.
Figure 3: The construction of a Nexus table / breadboard includes a (1) top skin, (2) bottom skin, (3) side finishing trim, (4) side panels, and (5) honeycomb core. The stainless steel top and bottom skins are 5 mm thick.
Figure 5: Torqueing the screw creates a force that pulls up on the table's top skin. The lifted skin tilts the mounting surface and can induce angular deviation of the object. This effect is exaggerated in the above image for illustrative purposes.
Figure 4: A standard clamping fork, such as the CL5A, contacts the table along only one edge. The opposite edge is in contact with the object to be secured. A bridge forms between the two. The screw that applies the clamping force is not shown.
Figure 6: The POLARIS-CA1/M clamping arm has a slot that accepts a mounting screw, a separate screw that applies a clamping force to an installed post, and identical top and bottom surfaces. Since a nearly continuous track around the surface of the clamping arm is in contact with the mounting surface, clamping arms cause negligible bridging effects.
Clamping forks are more rigid than the mounting surface of composite optical tables. It might be expected that the spine of the clamping fork would bend with the force exerted by the screw as the torque is increased. Instead, the screw will pull the skin of the table up and out of flat before the clamping fork deforms. Due to this, clamping forks should be used with care when securing components to optical tables. Clamping arms, which are discussed in the following, are alternatives to clamping forks that are less likely to deform the table's mounting surface.
Optical Table Construction Optical tables and breadboards with composite construction (Figure 3) are designed to be rigid while providing vibration damping. The 5 mm thick, stainless steel top skin is manufactured to be flat, but a localized force can deform it. When the top skin is deformed, optical components will not sit flat, and optical system alignment and performance can be negatively affected.
Clamping Forks Standard clamping forks are installed with one edge placed on the table's surface and the opposite edge on the object (Figure 4). Between these two edges, there is clearance between the bottom of the clamp and the surface of the table. This bridge makes it possible to use a single screw to both secure the clamp to the table and exert a holding force on the object.
When the clamp is secured by torqueing the screw, the screw pulls up on the top skin of the table (Figure 5).
As the torque on the screw increases, the top skin of the table rises. Not only does pulling up on the table surface risk permanently damaging the table, this can also disturb the alignment of the optical component the clamp is being used to secure. By lifting the table's skin, the mounting surface under the clamped object tilts.
Clamping Arms Clamping arms, such as the POLARIS-CA1/M, shown in Figure 6, are designed to secure a post while minimally deforming the mounting surface.
The clamping arm in Figure 6 differs from clamping forks in two significant ways. One is the surface area that makes contact with the optical table, which is highlighted in red, and the other is the method used to secure the post.
The area in contact with the optical table makes a nearly continuous loop around the base of the clamp. The contact area is flat and flush with the table when the clamp is installed. The only break in the loop is a narrow slot in the vise used to grip the post.
This design uses two screws, instead of the clamping fork's single screw. One screw (not shown) secures the clamp to the table, and the other (indicated) is tightened to grip the post. Since one screw is not required to perform both tasks, it is not necessary for this clamping arm to form a bridge between the clamped object and the optical table.
Although the contact area is a loop, and not a solid surface, this clamp causes negligible distortion of the mounting surface. This is due to the open area inside the contact surface being narrow and surrounded by the sides of the clamp, which resist the force pulling up on the table.
Figure 8: Install washers before inserting bolts into slots to protect the slot from damage. The rounded, smooth side of the washer should be placed against the slot, and the rough, flat side should be in contact with the bolt head. The smooth surface is designed to translate easily across the anodized surface, without harming it. The BA2 base is illustrated.
Figure 7: The diameter of the washer is 35% larger than that of the bolt head. This results in over a six fold increase in overlap area with the slot of a BA2 base. By distributing the force of the bolt over a larger area, the washer help prevent gouging of the slot.
The head of a standard cap screw is not much larger than the major diameter of the thread (Figure 7). For example, a ¼-20 screw has a head diameter between 0.365" and 0.375" and the clearance hole diameter for the threads is 0.264".
When the screw is tightened directly through the clearance hole to secure the device, the force is applied to the edge of the through hole, often cutting into the material (Figure 7).
Once the material is permanently deformed, the screw head will want to fall back into the gouged groove, thereby moving the device back to that location when attempting to make fine adjustments.
A device with a circular through hole is not meant to translate around the screw thread so the deformation is not expected to be a problem.
However, a slot should provide the ability to secure the device anywhere along the length for the lifetime of the part. Using a washer distributes the force away from the slot edge to decrease the chance of deforming the slot and extending the lifetime of the part. Figure 7 illustrates the difference a washer can make. The contact area between the slot of a BA2 base and a 0.27" diameter cap screw is 0.010 in2. When a 0.5" diameter washer is used the contact area is 0.064 in2, which is over six times larger.
When using a Thorlabs washer, there are two distinct sides (Figure 8). One side is flat and rough and the other is curved and polished. The curved and polished side should be placed against the device, which has an anodized surface.
As the screw tightens, the screw head can force the washer to spin against the anodized coating.
If the flat side is pressed down against the anodization, the friction created by the rough flat side can scratch the anodized aluminum. However, if the curved side is facing down, the smooth surface has less friction leading to less scratches and extending the visual appearance of the device.
Figure 9: The DC offset of a signal is its average value. Since the blue curve (AC Only) has an average amplitude of zero, it has a zero DC offset. The red signal (AC and DC) is identical to the blue, except the red signal has a non-zero AC offset. A DC coupling would pass the red signal unchanged. An AC coupling would remove the DC offset and attenuate low-frequency components of the signal.
When an instrument offers a choice between AC and DC coupled electrical inputs, it is not unusual for the DC coupling to be the better option for a modulated input signal.
AC and DC Couplings AC and DC couplings are interfaces between the input signal and the rest of the instrument's circuitry.
A DC coupling, which is called a direct coupling, is essentially a wire connected to the signal input. This conductive coupling transmits all of the signal's frequency components, the DC as well as the AC. The red curve in Figure 9 has a non-zero DC component.
In an AC coupling, the key feature is a capacitor placed in series with the signal input. The capacitor functions as a high-pass filter and is sometimes called a blocking capacitor. AC couplings strongly attenuate the DC and low-frequency signal components. This capacitive coupling is used to remove the DC offset from the input signal, so that only AC components are passed. The blue curve in Figure 9 has only AC frequency components.
Use the DC Coupled Input When Possible There are many reasons to prefer the DC coupled input. Its low-frequency response is very good, it allows the DC component of the signal to be monitored along with the AC, and it does not cause signal distortion since it does not affect the frequency content of the signal.
Use of the DC coupled input is recommended unless the DC offset is large or the filtering provided by the AC coupled input is required. One problem with a large DC offset is that it can reduce the resolution of the instrument to unacceptably low levels. In extreme cases, DC offsets can cause clipping and saturation effects.
Note that using the DC coupled input does not guarantee a signal free of distortion. Distortion can occur due to other reasons, such as insufficient device bandwidth or impedance mismatch at the termination.
Figure 11: Some modulated signals, including the blue curve plotted above, have no DC component, but they do have non-negligible low-frequency components. When this signal is high-pass filtered by an AC coupling, the resulting signal is distorted. The green curve is one example of this.
Figure 10: This frequency response magnitude plotted above models a capacitor-based high-pass filter. Its cutoff frequency (Fc) is 35 Hz, and it was used to filter the signal plotted in Figure 11. That signal has a repetition rate of 200 Hz.
Reasons to Use the AC Coupled Input By rejecting the signal's DC component, AC coupling can reduce the total amplitude of the signal. This can increase the measurement resolution provided by the instrument, as well as overcome saturation and clipping problems. AC coupling provides good results when information is carried by high frequency signal components and low frequency components are not of interest. AC coupling can also be preferred when the application does not tolerate DC frequency signal components, as is the case for some telecommunications applications.
When Using the AC Coupled Input If AC coupling is used, it is important to keep in mind that this coupling acts as a high pass filter and affects the frequency content of the signal.
As illustrated by Figure 10, this coupling does not just remove the DC offset, it can also attenuate low frequency components that may be of interest. Due to this, AC coupling can result in signal distortion. To illustrate the effects of high-pass filtering, Figure 11 plots a binary signal, with 200 Hz repetition rate, before and after it is filtered by the high-pass filter with 35 Hz cutoff frequency (Fc).
AC-coupled, digital telecommunications signals mitigate this problem by ensuring the signals are DC balanced, so that they have no DC offset. If the signals were not DC balanced, a series of ones could cause a sustained high signal level. This would introduce a non-zero DC level that would cause the signal to be affected by the capacitive filtering. The result could be bit errors due to high states being incorrectly read as low states.
Figure 12: The components shown above are joined using threaded interfaces. Since unscrewing the fiber connector could unintentionally loosen connections between the other components, Thorlabs suggests applying epoxy to the other two interfaces to immobilize them.
Fiber collimators are often used to introduce light into an optical setup from a fiber coupled source. Thorlabs offers a variety of fiber collimator packages, some only provide a smooth barrel (like the triplet collimators) and others have a metric thread at the end of the barrel (like the asphere collimators).
For both packages, Thorlabs typically suggests the use of an adapter with a nylon tipped set screw that holds the barrel against a two line contact.
Adapters for the external thread are available (AD1109F) that allow the user to thread the fiber collimator into a mount.
However, the use of these adapters results in a stack up of threaded interfaces (threaded fiber connector, threaded collimator, and threaded adapter). As a result, it is possible that unscrewing the fiber connector could inadvertently loosen another thread interface and create an unknown source of instability in the setup.
For this reason, Thorlabs suggests epoxying the threaded fiber collimators into the threaded mounts if that mounting mechanism is preferred.
How are the large mounting holes (counterbores) at the middle of a translation stage used?
The mounting points used to secure some translation stages to a table or breadboard are located closer to the middle, rather than the perimeter, of the stage. Securing and releasing the stage from the mounting surface requires centering the top plate over the bottom (base) plate. When this is done, the oversized through holes on the top plate form a counterbore with the smaller through holes on the bottom plate.
Cap screws can then be inserted through the oversized holes in the top plate and screwed into the mounting surface to secure the stage. This is demonstrated using an MT1B linear translation stage. The stage can be released by loosening and removing the screws via the same holes.
Figure 15: Each large through hole on the top surface of the stage provides the tip of a 3/16" (5 mm) ball driver access to the 1/4"-20 (M6) cap screws, which were previously inserted and used to secure the stage to the mounting surface.
Accessing the Mounting Points The mounting points (Figure 13) are through holes located in the base plate, which is part of the stage's fixed world. The diameters of these through holes are large enough to pass the threads, but not the heads, of 1/4"-20 (M6) cap screws. Access to these mounting points is via the larger through holes (Figure 14) in the top plate, which is part of the stage's moving world.
However, accessing the mounting points requires aligning the top and bottom plates. The adjuster can be used to translate the top plate into alignment, so that each large through hole in the top plate is concentric with a smaller through hole in the bottom plate, forming counterbores. If a cap screw is inserted, threads first, into one of the through holes in the top plate, it should be possible to guide the threads through the hole in the bottom plate.
Secure the Stage First, then Mount Components After the top and bottom plates are aligned, place the stage on the table or breadboard with the base plate in contact with the mounting surface. Align the counterbores with the threaded holes in the mounting surface, then insert a 1/4"-20 (M6) cap screw, from the top of the stage, into each through hole and then screw it into the table (Figure 15).
Since the top plate translates relative to the base plate, the top plate blocks access to the mounting points in general use. In addition, components mounted on the stage typically cover one or both of the through holes on the top plate. Due to this, it can be inconvenient to relocate the stage in the middle of an experiment. It is recommended that the stage be secured in an optimal location before mounting components on it.
Alternatively, a base plate like the MT401, which is designed for the MT stages, can be used to provide unobstructed mounting points at the perimeter of the stage. The stage is secured to the base plate as described here, and then the mounting slots on the base plate are used to secure the stage to a mounting surface.
Watch the Procedure Demonstrated The procedure is demonstrated in the video clip (Clip 1), and the full video includes additional Insights on translation stages, including the procedure for replacing its adjuster screw with a motorized actuator.
Is fast access to all mounting slots on a linear translation stage possible?
When a linear translation stage includes mounting slots at all four corners of the base plate, the position of the top plate usually blocks access to at least two of the mounting slots. A fast way to access all four slots, in pairs, is to retract the micrometer or actuator to expose two of the mounting slots, and then manually push the top plate into an extended position to expose the other two mounting slots. The top plate should then be held in the extended position by tightening the locking screw on the locking plate. This is demonstrated using an XR25P linear translation stage.
Figure 17: This perspective provides a view of the rectangular and slotted locking plate attached to the side of the stage opposite the micrometer. The image also shows that the top plate overhangs the two mounting slots at the back of the stage, blocking those slots when the slots at the front of the stage are exposed.
Figure 16: When the micrometer is completely retracted, the two mounting slots on one side of the stage are accessible. Each mounting slot accepts a 1/4"-20 (M6) cap screw and washer. The two mounting slots on the other side of the stage are blocked by the top plate.
Video Clip 2: The procedure for securing an XR25P linear translation stage to an optical table is demonstrated in this video clip.
Figure 18: The top plate can be quickly pushed from a retracted position into an extended position, providing access to the other two mounting slots. Tightening the locking plate's screw with a 5/64" (2 mm) hex key will hold the top plate in position.
Retract the Micrometer to Access Two Slots The four counterbored mounting slots used to secure these stages to an optical table or breadboard are integrated into the bottom (base) plate of these stages. Centering the top plate (moving world) over the base plate (fixed world) blocks access to all four mounting slots. Different pairs of mounting slots can be accessed when the top plate is retracted or extended.
To quickly access to all four slots, first retract the top plate using the micrometer or other adjuster. This exposes two of the mounting slots and makes it possible to secure or loosen a 1/4"-20 (M6) cap screw and its washer in each slot (Figure 16). As shown in Figure 17, the top plate overhangs and blocks the mounting slots on the other end of the stage in this position.
Push and Lock the Top Plate to Access Other Slots If the top plate is in a retracted position and the base is held stationary, the top plate can be manually pushed into an extended position against the internal spring force. Do not let go of the top plate. If it is released, the spring force will propel the top plate backwards until it collides with the mechanical stop, which can damage the stage.
Push the top plate just far enough to expose the mounting slots on the back of the base plate, and then tighten the screw in the locking plate (Figure 18) to hold the top plate into position. With the top plate immobilized, 1/4"-20 (M6) screw and washer pairs can be installed in or removed from the newly accessible mounting slots.
Protect the Stage from Damage When finished, hold the top plate to resist the spring force while loosening the screw in the locking plate. Slowly ease the top plate into its rest position to avoid causing a collision, whose mechanical shock can misalign the stage's components, affect the ball bearings, and introduce angular deviations to the stage's travel.
Watch the Procedure Demonstrated The procedure is demonstrated in the video clip (Clip 2), and the full video includes additional Insights on translation stages, including the procedure for replacing its adjuster screw with a motorized actuator.
Do translation stages isolate mounted components from vibrations transmitted through the adjuster?
Translation stages can be designed to couple vibrations from the adjuster to the fixed world of the bottom (base) plate, away from the moving world of the top plate. Attaching the barrel clamp, which secures the adjuster, to the base plate minimizes the vibrations experienced by the mounted optomechanical components when the operator manipulates the adjuster.
Figure 2: The independence of the top plate from the barrel clamp is better illustrated with the adjuster screw removed, as shown above. The top plate is retracted and is higher than the base of the barrel clamp, which is attached to the base plate.
Figure 1: The barrel clamp on the MT1B linear translation stage is indicated. Since the clamp is attached to the base plate, the top plate is isolated from vibrations arising from touching the adjuster screw.
Contact between Stage and Adjuster Barrel clamps integrate manual adjusters or motorized actuators with translation stages (Figure 1). The barrel of the adjuster is gripped solidly and securely by the clamp, which creates a rigid mechanical contact that will efficiently couple vibrations from the adjuster to the clamp. Since the clamp is bolted directly to the base plate (Figure 2), vibrations from touching the adjuster will be routed to the fixed world of the stage. Those vibrations will be damped by the optical table or other mounting surface to which the stage is secured.
The only direct contact between the actuator and the stage's top plate, on which optomechanical components are mounted, occurs at a single point on the actuator's tip. Since this is not a rigid connection, it provides poor vibrational coupling between the actuator and the top plate. Similarly, contact points between the top and bottom plates are not rigid and do not efficiently transmit vibrations.
Want additional Insights on translation stages? Watch a video that discusses mounting techniques and the procedure for replacing a stage's manual adjuster with a motorized actuator.
Figure 4: Top view. The three contact locations between the post and post holder, highlighted in red, prevent the post from translating or rotating around the x- or y-axes. Friction resists the post's translation and rotation around the z-axis.
Figure 3: A channel with sharp edges is machined into the inner bore of Thorlabs' post holders.
Figure 5: A broach, such as the one illustrated above, has a row of teeth, the next taller than the previous. With the teeth in contact with the material, a machine pulls the broach across the surface. Each tooth removes a small amount of material, and the depth of the channel created by the broach equals the overall difference in tooth height.
All of Thorlabs' post holders include a channel, with straight parallel edges, running the length of the inner bore (Figure 3). Tightening the setscrew pushes the post against the two edges of the channel (Figure 4). Since the edges of the channel are separated by a wide distance, approximately half the inner diameter of the post holder, the seating of the post against the channel's edges is stable and repeatable.
Contact with the two edges of the channel eliminates four of the post's six degrees of freedom, since the edges block the post from translating along or rotating around either the y- or z-axis. In addition, the friction between the side of the post and the edges of the channel resists the post's movement along and around the x-axis, which are the post's two remaining degrees of freedom.
Without the channel in the inner bore, there would be a single line of contact between the post and post holder. The position of the post would not be stable, since the post would be free to rotate around the z-axis and shift along the y-axis.
Even if this instability resulted in submicron-scale unwanted shifts in each component's position in an optical setup, the cumulative effect could have a significant negative impact on system performance. In addition, more frequent realignment of the system could be required.
Broaching The channel's edges must be straight and free of bumps and roughness to hold the post stable. These post holders have straight, sharp edges when examined on a micron scale. If the edges are not completely linear, the post might rock in the holder, and / or it may not be possible to repeatably position the post in the holder.
The smooth, straight edges of the channel are achieved using a machining process called broaching. A broach (Figure 5) resembles a saw whose teeth increase in height along its length.
As the broach is pulled along a surface, each tooth removes a small amount of material. The total depth of the channel cut by the broach equals to the overall difference in tooth height (H2 - H1 ).
Compared with other approaches for creating channels, broaching is preferred due to its ability to provide straight profiles while being compatible with high-volume production.
Figure 9: Pads machined into Thorlabs' devices improve their stability when bolted in place. The pads are highly flat and project above the undercut region, which is highlighted red. The undercut limits the contact area with the table or breadboard.
Figure 8: The mounting platforms of stages and other devices do not feature pads.
An undercut is machined into the bottom surface of bases like the BA2 (Figures 6 and 7). The undercut creates feet, which are called pads. For maximum stability, the base should be oriented with its pads in contact with the table or breadboard.
The top surface of the base does not have an undercut and is the intended mounting surface for components.
Mounting the base upside down could result in the base rocking on the table or breadboard, or the base may exhibit other mechanical instability.
The Pads are Flatter than the Top Surface The undercut is key to the flatness of the pads. The pads are machined flat after the undercut is made.
Friction heats the pads during the processing step that provides them with a maximally flat profile. By reducing the surface area of the pads, the undercut reduces the amount of heat generated during this step.
It is beneficial to minimize the heat generated during machining. Metal expands when heated, and the uneven heating that occurs during machining can distort the dimensions of the part. If the dimensions of the part are distorted during machining, the part can be left with high spots and other undesirable features after it cools. This can cause instability and misalignment when using the part.
Precision Instruments and Devices have Pads Another example of a component with pads is the LX10 linear stage shown in Figures 8 and 9.
Figure 1: Rays incident at angles ≤θmax will be captured by the cores of multimode fiber, since these rays experience total internal reflection (TIR) at the interface between core and cladding. A requirement for TIR is that ncore > nclad .
Figure 2: The behavior of the ray at the boundary between the core and cladding, which depends on their refractive indices, determines whether the ray incident on the end face is coupled into the core. The equation for NA can be found using geometry and the two equations noted at the top of this figure.
Acceptance Angle and NA In the ray model of light, a ray's angle of incidence determines whether or not it will be coupled into the fiber's core. The cutoff angle is the maximum acceptance angle (θmax ), which is related to the NA (Figure 1).
Rays with an angle of incidence ≤θmax are totally internally reflected (TIR) at the boundary between the fiber's core and cladding. As these rays propagate down the fiber, they remain trapped in the core.
Rays with angles of incidence larger than θmax refract at and pass through the interface between the core and cladding. This light may travel in the cladding for a while but is eventually lost from the fiber.
Geometry Defines the Relationship The relationship between NA and θmax can be found using the geometry diagrammed in Figure 2. Snell's law was used at both interfaces, and the substitution sin(90°) = 1 was made. This geometry illustrates the most extreme conditions under which TIR will occur at the boundary between the core and cladding.
The refractive indices of the core and cladding, ncore and nclad , respectively, play a key role. In order for TIR to occur, ncore must be larger than nclad . The greater their difference, the larger the NA and maximum acceptance angle.
Angles of Incidence and Fiber Modes When the angle of incidence is ≤θmax , the incident light ray is coupled into one of the multimode fiber's guided modes. Generally speaking, the lower the angle of incidence, the lower the order of the excited fiber mode. Lower-order modes concentrate most of their intensity near the center of the core. The lowest order mode is excited by rays incident normally on the end face.
Single Mode Fibers are Different In the case of single mode fibers, the ray model in Figure 2 is not useful, and the calculated NA (acceptance angle) does not equal the maximum angle of incidence or describe the fiber's light gathering ability.
Single mode fibers have only one guided mode, the lowest order mode, which is excited by rays with 0° angles of incidence. However, calculating the NA results in a nonzero value. The ray model also does not accurately predict the divergence angles of the light beams successfully coupled into and emitted from single mode fibers. The beam divergence occurs due to diffraction effects, which are not taken into account by the ray model but can be described using the wave optics model. The Gaussian beam propagation model can be used to calculate beam divergence with high accuracy.
Figure 3 For maximum coupling efficiency into single mode fibers, the light should be an on-axis Gaussian beam with its waist located at the fiber's end face, and the waist diameter should equal the MFD. The beam output by the fiber also resembles a Gaussian with these characteristics. In the case of single mode fibers, the ray optics model and NA are inadequate for determining coupling conditions. The mode intensity (I ) profile across the radius ( ρ ) is illustrated.
As light propagates down a single mode fiber, the beam maintains a cross sectional profile that is nearly Gaussian in shape. The mode field diameter (MFD) describes the width of this intensity profile. The better an incident beam matches this intensity profile, the larger the fraction of light coupled into the fiber. An incident Gaussian beam with a beam waist equal to the MFD can achieve particularly high coupling efficiency.
Using the MFD as the beam waist in the Gaussian beam propagation model can provide highly accurate incident beam parameters, as well as the output beam's divergence.
Determining Coupling Requirements A benefit of optical fibers is that light carried by the fibers' guided mode(s) does not spread out radially and is minimally attenuated as it propagates. Coupling light into one of a fiber's guided modes requires matching the characteristics of the incident light to those of the mode. Light that is not coupled into a guided mode radiates out of the fiber and is lost. This light is said to leak out of the fiber.
Single mode fibers have one guided mode, and wave optics analysis reveals the mode to be described by a Bessel function. The amplitude profiles of Gaussian and Bessel functions closely resemble one another , which is convenient since using a Gaussian function as a substitute simplifies the modeling the fiber's mode while providing accurate results.
Figure 3 illustrates the single mode fiber's mode intensity cross section, which the incident light must match in order to couple into the guided mode. The intensity (I ) profile is a near-Gaussian function of radial distance ( ρ ). The MFD, which is constant along the fiber's length, is the width measured at an intensity equal to the product of e-2 and the peak intensity. The MFD encloses ~86% of the beam's power.
Since lasers emitting only the lowest-order transverse mode provide Gaussian beams, this laser light can be efficiently coupled into single mode fibers.
Coupling Light into the Single Mode Fiber To efficiently couple light into the core of a single-mode fiber, the waist of the incident Gaussian beam should be located at the fiber's end face. The intensity profile of the beam's waist should overlap and match the characteristics of the mode intensity cross section. The required incident beam parameters can be calculated using the fiber's MFD with the Gaussian beam propagation model.
The coupling efficiency will be reduced if the beam waist is a different diameter than the MFD, the cross-sectional profile of the beam is distorted or shifted with respect to the modal spot at the end face, and / or if the light is not directed along the fiber's axis.
References  Andrew M. Kowalevicz Jr. and Frank Bucholtz, Beam Divergence from an SMF-28 Optical Fiber(NRL/MR/5650--06-8996)(Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 2006).
Does NA provide a good estimate of beam divergence from a single mode fiber?
Significant error can result when the numerical aperture (NA) is used to estimate the cone of light emitted from, or that can be coupled into, a single mode fiber. A better estimate is obtained using the Gaussian beam propagation model to calculate the divergence angle. This model allows the divergence angle to be calculated for whatever beam spot size best suits the application.
Since the mode field diameter (MFD) specified for single mode optical fibers encloses ~86% of the beam power, this definition of spot size is often appropriate when collimating light from and focusing light into a single mode fiber. In this case, to a first approximation and when measured in the far field,
is the divergence or acceptance angle (θSM), in radians. This is half the full angular extent of the beam, it is wavelength () dependent, and the beam's waist diameter has been set equal to the fiber's MFD .
Figure 4: These curves illustrate the consequence of using NA to calculate the divergence (θSM ) of light output from a single mode fiber. Significant error in beam spot diameter can be avoided by using the Gaussian beam propagation model.
This plot models a beam from SM980-5.8-125. The values used for NA and MFD were 0.13 and 6.4 µm, respectively. The operating wavelength was 980 nm, and the Rayleigh range was 32.8 µm.
Gaussian Beam Approach Although a diverging cone of light is emitted from the end face of a single mode optical fiber, this light does not behave as multiple rays travelling at different angles to the fiber's axis.
The divergence angle of a Gaussian beam can differ substantially from the angle calculated by assuming the light behaves as rays. Using the ray model, the divergence angle would equal sin-1(NA). However, the relationship between NA and divergence angle is only valid for highly multimode fibers.
Figure 4 illustrates that using the NA to estimate the divergence angle can result in significant error. In this case, the divergence angle was needed for a point on the circle enclosing 86% of the beam's optical power. The intensity of a point on this circle is a factor of 1/e2 lower than the peak intensity.
The equations to the right of the plot in Figure 4 were used to accurately model the divergence of the beam emitted from the single mode fiber's end face. The values used to complete the calculations, including the fiber's MFD, NA, and operating wavelength are given in the figure's caption. This rate of beam divergence assumes a beam size defined by the 1/e2 radius, is nonlinear for distances z < zR , and is approximately linear in the far field (z >> zR ).
The angles noted on the plot were calculated from each curve's respective slope. When the far field approximation given by Equation (1) is used, the calculated divergence angle is 0.098 radians (5.61°).
References  Andrew M. Kowalevicz Jr. and Frank Bucholtz, Beam Divergence from an SMF-28 Optical Fiber(NRL/MR/5650--06-8996)(Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 2006).
Date of Last Edit: Feb. 28, 2020 Content improved by our readers!
Figure 5 For maximum coupling efficiency into single mode fibers, the light should be an on-axis Gaussian beam with its waist located at the fiber's end face, and the waist diameter should equal the MFD.
Adjusting the incident beam's angle, position, and intensity profile can improve the coupling efficiency of light into a single mode optical fiber. Assuming the fiber's end face is planar and perpendicular to the fiber's long axis, coupling efficiency is optimized for beams meeting the following criteria (Figure 5):
Gaussian intensity profile.
Normal incidence on the fiber's end face.
Beam waist in the plane of the end face.
Beam waist centered on the fiber's core.
Diameter of the beam waist equal to the mode field diameter (MFD) of the fiber.
Deviations from these ideal coupling conditions are illustrated in Figure 6.
The Light Source can Limit Coupling Efficiency Lasers emitting only the lowest-order transverse mode provide beams with near-Gaussian profiles, which can be efficiently coupled into single mode fibers.
The coupling efficiency of light from multimode lasers or broadband light sources into the guided mode of a single mode fiber will be poor, even if the light is focused on the core region of the end face. Most of the light from these sources will leak out of the fiber.
The poor coupling efficiency is due to only a fraction of the light in these multimode sources matching the characteristics of the single mode fiber's guided mode. By spatially filtering the light from the source, the amount of light that may be coupled into the fiber's core can be estimated. At best, a single mode fiber will accept only the light in the Gaussian beam output by the filter.
The coupling efficiency of light from a multimode source into a fiber's core can be improved if a multimode fiber is used instead of a single mode fiber.
References  Andrew M. Kowalevicz Jr. and Frank Bucholtz, Beam Divergence from an SMF-28 Optical Fiber(NRL/MR/5650--06-8996)(Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 2006).
Is the max acceptance angle constant across the core of a multimode fiber?
It depends on the type of fiber. A step-index multimode fiber provides the same maximum acceptance angle at every position across the fiber's core. Graded-index multimode fibers, in contrast, accept rays with the largest range of incident angles only at the core's center. The maximum acceptance angle decreases with distance from the center and approaches 0° near the interface with the cladding.
Figure 7: Step-index multimode fibers have an index of refraction (n ) that is constant across the core. Graded-index multimode fibers have an index that varies across the core. Typically the maximum index occurs at the center.
Figure 9: Graded-index multimode fibers have acceptance angles that vary with radius ( ρ ), since the refractive index of the core varies with radius. The largest acceptance angles typically occur near the center, and the smallest, which approach 0°, occur near the boundary with the cladding (0 < ρ1 < ρ2 ). Air is assumed to surround the fiber.
Figure 8: Step-index multimode fibers accept light incident in the core at angles ≤|θmax | with good coupling efficiency. The maximum acceptance angle is constant across the core's radius ( ρ ). Air is assumed to surround the fiber.
Step-Index Multimode Fiber The core of a step-index multimode fiber has a flat-top index profile, which is illustrated on the left side of Figure 7. When light is coupled into the planar end face of the fiber, the maximum acceptance angle (θmax) is the same at every location across the core (Figure 8). This is due to the constant value of refractive index across the core, since the acceptance angle depends strongly on the index of the cladding.
Regardless of whether rays are incident near the center or edge of the core, step-index multimode fibers will accept cones of rays spanning angles ±θmax with respect to the fiber's axis.
Graded-Index Multimode Fibers The core of a typical graded-index multimode fiber, shown on the right side of Figure 7, has a refractive index that is greatest at the center of the core and decreases with radial distance (ρ). The equation included below the diagram in Figure 9 shows that the radial dependence of the core's refractive index results in a radial dependence of the maximum acceptance angle and numerical aperture (NA). This equation also assumes a planar end face, normal to the fiber's axis that is surrounded by air.
Cones of rays with angular ranges limited by the core's refractive index profile are illustrated Figure 9. The cone of rays with the largest angular spread (±θmax ) occurs on the fiber's axis (ρ = 0). The angular spread decreases as the radial distance to the axis increases.
Step-Index or Graded Index? A step-index multimode fiber has the potential to collect more light than a graded-index multimode fiber. This is due to the NA being constant across the step-index core, while the NA decreases with radial distance across the graded-index core.
However, the graded-index profile causes all of the guided modes to have similar propagation velocities, which reduces the modal dispersion of the light beam as it travels in the fiber.
For applications that rely on coupling as much light as possible into the multimode fiber and are less sensitive to modal dispersion, a step-index multimode fiber may be the better choice. If the reverse is true, a graded-index multimode fiber should be considered.
References  Gerd Keiser, Optical Fiber Communications(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991), Section 2.6.
Figure 1: Typical yields at each wavelength are around four orders of magnitude lower than the excitation wavelength. 
The spectral fluorescence yield relates the intensity of the fluorescence emitted within the integrating sphere with the intensity of the excitation wavelength. The yield is calculated by dividing the wavelength-dependent, total fluorescence excited over the entire interior surface of the sphere by the intensity of the light excitation.
Data were kindly provided by Dr. Ping-Shine Shaw, Physics Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.
A material of choice for coating the light-diffusing cavities of integrating spheres is polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). This material, which is white in appearance, is favored for reasons including its high, flat reflectance over a wide range of wavelengths and chemical inertness.
However, it should be noted that integrating spheres coated with both PTFE and barium sulfate, which is an alternative coating with lower reflectance, emit low levels of ultraviolet (UV) and blue fluorescence when irradiated by UV light. [1-3]
Hydrocarbons in the PTFE Fluoresce It is not the PTFE that fluoresces. The sources of the UV and blue fluorescence are hydrocarbons in the PTFE. Low levels of hydrocarbon impurities are present in the raw coating material, and pollution sources deposit additional hydrocarbon contaminants in the PTFE material of the integrating sphere during its use and storage. 
Fluorescence Wavelength Bands and Strength Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have investigated the fluorescence excited by illuminating PTFE-coated integrating spheres. The total fluorescence output by the integrating sphere was measured with respect to fluorescence wavelength and excitation wavelength. The maximum fluorescence was approximately four orders of magnitude lower than the intensity of the exciting radiation.
The UV and blue fluorescence from PTFE is primarily excited by incident wavelengths in a 200 nm to 300 nm absorption band. The fluorescence is emitted in the 250 nm to 400 nm wavelength range, as shown by Figure 1. These data indicate that increasing the excitation wavelength decreases the fluorescence emitted at lower wavelengths and changes the shape of the fluorescence spectrum.
As the levels of hydrocarbon contaminants in the PFTE increase, fluorescence increases. A related effect is a decrease of the light output by the integrating sphere over the absorption band wavelengths, due to more light from this spectral region being absorbed. [1, 3]
Impact on Applications The UV and blue fluorescence from the PTFE has negligible effect on many applications, since the intensity of the fluorescence is low and primarily excited by incident wavelengths <300 nm. Applications sensitive to this fluorescence include long-term measurements of UV radiation throughput, UV source calibration, establishing UV reflectance standards, and performing some UV remote sensing tasks. 
Minimizing Fluorescence Effects Minimizing and stabilizing the fluorescence levels requires isolating the integrating sphere from all sources of hydrocarbons, including gasoline- and diesel-burning engine exhaust and organic solvents, such as naphthalene and toluene. It should be noted that, while hydrocarbon contamination can be minimized and reduced, it cannot be eliminated. 
Since the history of each integrating sphere's exposure to hydrocarbon contaminants is unique, it is not possible to predict the response of a particular sphere to incident radiation. When an application is negatively impacted by the fluorescence, calibration of the integrating sphere is recommended. A calibration procedure described in  requires a light source with a well-known spectrum that extends across the wavelength region of interest, such as a deuterium lamp or synchrotron radiation, a monochromator, a detector, and the integrating sphere.
References  Ping-Shine Shaw, Zhigang Li, Uwe Arp, and Keith R. Lykke, "Ultraviolet characterization of integrating spheres," Appl.Opt.46, 5119-5128 (2007).  Jan Valenta, "Photoluminescence of the integrating sphere walls, its influence on the absolute quantum yield measurements and correction methods," AIP Advances8, 102123 (2018).  Robert D. Saunders and William R. Ott, "Spectral irradiance measurements: effect of UV-produced fluorescence in integrating spheres," Appl. Opt.15, 827-828 (1976).  Ping-Shine Shaw, Uwe Arp, and Keith R. Lykke, "Measurement of the ultraviolet-induced fluorescence yield from integrating spheres," Metrologia46, S191 - S196 (2009).
Figure 2: Measuring diffuse sample transmittance and reflectance as shown above can result in a distorted sample spectrum due to sample substitution error. The problem is that the reflectivity over the sample area is different during the reference and sample measurements.
Figure 3: The above configuration is not susceptible to sample substitution error, since the interior of the sphere is the same for reference and sample measurements. During the reference measurement the light travels along (R), and no light is incident along (S). The opposite is true when a sample measurement is made.
Absolute transmittance and absolute diffuse reflectance spectra of optical samples can be found using integrating spheres. These spectra are found by performing spectral measurements of both the sample of interest and a reference.
Measurement of a reference is needed since this provides the spectrum of the illuminating light source. Obtaining the reference scan allows the spectrum of the light source to be subtracted from the sample measurement.
The light source reference measurement is made with no sample in place for transmittance data and with a highly reflective white standard reference sample in place for reflectance measurements.
Sample substitution errors incurred while acquiring the sample and reference measurement sets can negatively effect the accuracy of the corrected sample spectrum, unless the chosen experimental technique is immune to these errors.
Conditions Leading to Sample Substitution Errors An integrating sphere's optical performance depends on the reflectance at each point on its entire inner surface. Often, a section of the sphere's inner wall is replaced by the sample when its transmittance and diffuse reflectance spectra are measured (Figure 2). However, modifying a section of the inner wall alters the performance of the integrating sphere.
Sample substitution errors are a concern when the measurement procedure involves physically changing one sample installed within the sphere for another. For example, when measuring diffuse reflectance (Figure 2, bottom), a first measurement might be made with the standard reference sample mounted inside the sphere. Next, this sample would be removed and replaced by the sample of interest, and a second measurement would be acquired. Both data sets would then be used to calculate the corrected absolute diffuse reflectance spectrum of the sample.
This procedure would result in a distorted absolute sample spectrum. Since the sample of interest and the standard reference have different absorption and scattering properties, exchanging them alters the reflectivity of the integrating sphere over the samples' surface areas. Due to the average reflectivity of the integrating sphere being different for the two measurements, they are not perfectly compatible.
Solution Option: Install Sample and Reference Together One experimental technique that avoids sample substitution errors acquires measurement data when both sample and reference are installed inside the integrating sphere at the same time (Figure 3). This approach requires an integrating sphere large enough to accomodate the two, as additional ports.
The light source is located external to the integrating sphere, and measurements of the sample and standard reference are acquired sequentially. The specular reflection from the sample, or the transmitted beam, is often routed out of the sphere, so that only the diffuse light is detected. Since the inner surface of the sphere is identical for both measurements, sample substitution errors are not a concern.
Alternate Solution Option: Make Measurements from Sample and Reference Ports If it is not possible to install both sample and standard references in the integrating sphere at the same time, it is necessary to exchange the installed sample. If this must be done, sample substitution errors can be removed by following the procedure detailed in .
This procedure requires a total of four measurements. When the standard sample is installed, measurements are made from two different ports. One has a field of view that includes the sample and the other does not. The sample of interest is then subsituted in and the measurements are repeated. Performing the calculations described in  using these measurements removes the sample substitution errors.
References  Luka Vidovic and Boris Majaron, "Elimination of single-beam substitution error in diffuse reflectance measurements using an integrating sphere," J. Biomed.Opt.19, 027006 (2014).
Are collimated beams always emitted parallel to the laser's axis?
A laser may not emit its beam parallel to the long axis of the laser package. This angular deviation is called the pointing angle (θp) and is described in Clip 1. Compensating for an angular deviation can be achieved when a kinematic mount with pitch (tip) and yaw (tilt) adjustments is used to position the laser.
Video Clip 1: The pointing angle (θp) is the angular deviation between the direction of the collimated laser beam (red arrow) and the long axis of the laser housing (dotted line). This axis is perpendicular to the front face of the collimator or collimated laser package.
Video Clip 2: Fitting a PL202 collimated laser package with an AD11NT adapter makes it possible to secure the laser in a KM100 mount that provides pitch (tip) and yaw (tilt) adjustment capability.
Angular Deviation Several factors can result in angular deviation of the beam, including non-optimal seating of the laser in a mount, the laser cavity not being perfectly centered in the housing, and the deflection of the beam as it travels through optics integrated within the laser package. The compounded tolerances (tolerance stack up) result in a non-zero pointing angle.
When the laser has a cylindrical housing, this deviation can be measured by placing the laser in a V-groove mount, rotating the laser around its long axis, and recording the diameter of the circle traced by the laser spot. Maximum angular deviation is often specified for collimated laser packages.
Using a Kinematic Mount to Correct the Angle One method to correct the angle of a laser beam is to secure the laser in a kinematic mount and use the mount's adjusters to tune the pitch and yaw of the laser.
In some cases, the kinematic mount is directly compatible with the outer diameter of the laser housing. Kinematic V-mounts, including those compatible with Ø1.5" posts, can be configured to accept a range of different housing diameters without the use of an adapter.
Other kinematic mounts have an inner bore with a fixed diameter. A variety of adapters, including some designed for cylindrical or SM-threaded components, are available to create compatibility between the outer diameter of the laser housing and the mounts' inner bore.
Attaching an Adapter The procedure for using an AD11NT adapter to install a PL202 collimated laser package into a KM100 kinematic mount is demonstrated in Clip 2. Before attaching the adapter, pass the laser head through the bore of the kinematic mount, from back to front.
Because there is a stop integrated into the back plane of the mount's inner bore, it is necessary to attach the adapter on the side of the mount opposite the adjusters. The stop helps secure 1" diameter optics in the bore, but it also prevents the 1" diameter adapter from being inserted into the bore from the back of the mount.
The adapter includes nylon-tipped setscrews to secure the laser, and the mount also includes a nylon-tipped setscrew to secure the adapter. Nylon-tipped setscrews are chosen to securely grip the installed component without scratching or otherwise marring its surface.
Want additional Insights on correcting for the pointing angle? Watch the full video.
Figure 1: This example of an L-I curve for a QCL laser illustrates the typical non-linear slope and rollover region exhibited by QCL and ICL lasers. Operating parameters determine the heat load carried by the lasing region, which influences the peak output power. This laser was installed in a temperature controlled mount set to 25 °C.
Figure 2: This set of L-I curves for a QCL laser illustrates that the mount temperature can affect the peak operating temperature, but that using a temperature controlled mount does not remove the danger of applying a driving current large enough to exceed the rollover point and risk damaging the laser.
The light vs. driving current (L-I) curves measured for quantum and interband cascade Lasers (QCLs and ICLs) include a rollover region, which is enclosed by the red box in Figure 1.
The rollover region includes the peak output power of the laser, which corresponds to a driving current of just under 500 mA in this example. Applying higher drive currents risks damaging the laser.
Laser Operation These lasers operate by forcing electrons down a controlled series of energy steps, which are created by the laser's semiconductor layer structure and an applied bias voltage. The driving current supplies the electrons.
An electron must give up some of its energy to drop down to a lower energy level. When an electron descends one of the laser's energy steps, the electron loses energy in the form of a photon. But, the electron can also lose energy by giving it to the semiconductor material as heat, instead of emitting a photon.
Heat Build Up Lasers are not 100% efficient in forcing electrons to surrender their energy in the form of photons. The electrons that lose their energy as heat cause the temperature of the lasing region to increase.
Conversely, heat in the lasing region can be absorbed by electrons. This boost in energy can scatter electrons away from the path leading down the laser's energy steps. Later, scattered electrons typically lose energy as heat, instead of as photons.
As the temperature of the lasing region increases, more electrons are scattered, and a smaller fraction of them produce light instead of heat. Rising temperatures can also result in changes to the laser's energy levels that make it harder for electrons to emit photons. These processes work together to increase the temperature of the lasing region and to decrease the efficiency with which the laser converts current to laser light.
Operating Limits are Determined by the Heat Load Ideally, the slope of the L-I curve would be linear above the threshold current, which is around 270 mA in Figure 1. Instead, the slope decreases as the driving current increases, which is due to the effects from the rising temperature of the lasing region. Rollover occurs when the laser is no longer effective in converting additional current to laser light. Instead, the extra driving creates only heat. When the current is high enough, the strong localized heating of the laser region will cause the laser to fail.
A temperature controlled mount is typically necessary to help manage the temperature of the lasing region. But, since the thermal conductivity of the semiconductor material is not high, heat can still build up in the lasing region. As illustrated in Figure 2, the mount temperature affects the peak optical output power but does not prevent rollover.
The maximum drive current and the maximum optical output power of QCLs and ICLs depend on the operating conditions, since these determine the heat load of the lasing region.
Figure 3: The external housing of HeNe lasers is mechanically coupled to the components of the lasing cavity. Stress applied to the external housing can misalign and potentially fracture lasing cavity components, which can negatively impact the quality and power of the output laser beam (red arrow) or lead to laser failure
High Reflector Optics
Glass Laser Bore
Metal Springs that Align and Stabilize Bore
Output Coupling Optics
HeNe lasers should be handled and mounted with care to protect them from damage.
Never apply a bending force to the laser housing. Stress applied to the laser's external housing can misalign or damage components in the laser cavity. This can:
Affect the output beam quality.
Result in reduced output power.
Affect the beam pointing.
Cause multimode effects.
Factory packaging protects the HeNe lasers from shocks and vibrations during shipping, but end users directly handle the bare laser housing. Due to this, HeNe lasers are in greater danger of experiencing dangerous stress during handling by the end user.
A result is that the primary cause of damage to HeNe lasers is rough handling after receipt of the laser. In extreme cases, shock and vibrations can shatter or fracture glass components internal to the laser.
To maintain the optimum performance of your HeNe laser, do not drop it, never use force when inserting it into fixture, and use care when installing it into mounts, securing it using cage components or ring accessories that grip the housing, transporting it, and storing it.
HeNe lasers will provide optimum performance over a long lifetime when they are handled gently.
Figure 6: Rise time (tr ) of the intensity signal is typically measured between the 10% and 90% points on the curve. The rise time depends on the wheel's rotation rate and the beam diameter.
Camera and scanning-slit beam profilers are tools for characterizing beam size and shape, but these instruments cannot provide an accurate measurement if the beam size is too small or the wavelength is outside of the operating range.
A chopper wheel, photodetector, and oscilloscope can provide an approximate measurement of the beam size (Figure 4). As the rotating chopper wheel's blade passes through the beam, an S-shaped trace is displayed on the oscilloscope.
When the blade sweeps through the angle θ , the rise or fall time of the S-curve is proportional to the size of the beam along the direction of the blade's travel (Figure 5). A point on the blade located a distance R from the center of the wheel sweeps through an arc length (Rθ ) that is approximately equal to the size of the beam along this direction.
To make this beam size measurement, the combined response of the detector and oscilloscope should be much faster than the signal's rate of change.
Example: S-Curve with Rising Edge The angle (θ = ftr ) subtended by the beam depends on the signal's rise time (Figure 6) and the wheel's rotation rate (f ), whose units are Hz or revolutions/s. The arc length (Rθ = R ⋅ ftr ) through the beam can be calculated using this angle. For a small Gaussian-shaped beam, a first approximation of the 1/e2 beam diameter (D ),
has a factor of 0.64 to account for measuring rise time between the 10% and 90% intensity points.
Figure 1: C-mount lenses and cameras have the same flange focal distance (FFD), 17.526 mm. This ensures light through the lens focuses on the camera's sensor. Both components have 1.000"-32 threads, sometimes referred to as "C-mount threads".
Figure 2: CS-mount lenses and cameras have the same flange focal distance (FFD), 12.526 mm. This ensures light through the lens focuses on the camera's sensor. Their 1.000"-32 threads are identical to threads on C-mount components, sometimes referred to as "C-mount threads."
The C-mount and CS-mount camera system standards both include 1.000"-32 threads, but the two mount types have different flange focal distances (FFD, also known as flange focal depth, flange focal length, register, flange back distance, and flange-to-film distance). The FFD is 17.526 mm for the C-mount and 12.526 mm for the CS-mount (Figures 1 and 2, respectively).
Since their flange focal distances are different, the C-mount and CS-mount components are not directly interchangeable. However, with an adapter, it is possible to use a C-mount lens with a CS-mount camera.
Mixing and Matching C-mount and CS-mount components have identical threads, but lenses and cameras of different mount types should not be directly attached to one another. If this is done, the lens' focal plane will not coincide with the camera's sensor plane due to the difference in FFD, and the image will be blurry.
With an adapter, a C-mount lens can be used with a CS-mount camera (Figures 3 and 4). The adapter increases the separation between the lens and the camera's sensor by 5.0 mm, to ensure the lens' focal plane aligns with the camera's sensor plane.
In contrast, the shorter FFD of CS-mount lenses makes them incompatible for use with C-mount cameras (Figure 5). The lens and camera housings prevent the lens from mounting close enough to the camera sensor to provide an in-focus image, and no adapter can bring the lens closer.
It is critical to check the lens and camera parameters to determine whether the components are compatible, an adapter is required, or the components cannot be made compatible.
1.000"-32 Threads Imperial threads are properly described by their diameter and the number of threads per inch (TPI). In the case of both these mounts, the thread diameter is 1.000" and the TPI is 32. Due to the prevalence of C-mount devices, the 1.000"-32 thread is sometimes referred to as a "C-mount thread." Using this term can cause confusion, since CS-mount devices have the same threads.
Measuring Flange Focal Distance Measurements of flange focal distance are given for both lenses and cameras. In the case of lenses, the FFD is measured from the lens' flange surface (Figures 1 and 2) to its focal plane. The flange surface follows the lens' planar back face and intersects the base of the external 1.000"-32 threads. In cameras, the FFD is measured from the camera's front face to the sensor plane. When the lens is mounted on the camera without an adapter, the flange surfaces on the camera front face and lens back face are brought into contact.
Figure 5: A CS-mount lens is not directly compatible with a C-mount camera, since the light focuses before the camera's sensor. Adapters are not useful, since the solution would require shrinking the flange focal distance of the camera (blue arrow).
Figure 4: An adapter with the proper thickness moves the C-mount lens away from the CS-mount camera's sensor by an optimal amount, which is indicated by the length of the purple arrow. This allows the lens to focus light on the camera's sensor, despite the difference in FFD.
Figure 3: A C-mount lens and a CS-mount camera are not directly compatible, since their flange focal distances, indicated by the blue and yellow arrows, respectively, are different. This arrangement will result in blurry images, since the light will not focus on the camera's sensor.
Figure 7: An adapter can be used to optimally position a CS-mount lens on a camera whose flange focal distance is less than 12.526 mm. This sketch is based on a Zelux camera and its SM1A10 adapter.
All Kiralux™ and Quantalux® scientific cameras are factory set to accept C-mount lenses. When the attached C-mount adapters are removed from the passively cooled cameras, the SM1 (1.035"-40) internal threads in their flanges can be used. The Zelux scientific cameras also have SM1 internal threads in their mounting flanges, as well as the option to use a C-mount or CS-mount adapter.
The SM1 threads integrated into the camera housings are intended to facilitate the use of lens assemblies created from Thorlabs components. Adapters can also be used to convert from the camera's C-mount configurations. When designing an application-specific lens assembly or considering the use of an adapter not specifically designed for the camera, it is important to ensure that the flange focal distances (FFD) of the camera and lens match, as well as that the camera's sensor size accommodates the desired field of view (FOV).
Made for Each Other: Cameras and Their Adapters Fixed adapters are available to configure the Zelux cameras to meet C-mount and CS-mount standards (Figures 6 and 7). These adapters, as well as the adjustable C-mount adapters attached to the passively cooled Kiralux and Quantalux cameras, were designed specifically for use with their respective cameras.
While any adapter converting from SM1 to 1.000"-32 threads makes it possible to attach a C-mount or CS-mount lens to one of these cameras, not every thread adapter aligns the lens' focal plane with a specific camera's sensor plane. In some cases, no adapter can align these planes. For example, of these scientific cameras, only the Zelux can be configured for CS-mount lenses.
The position of the lens' focal plane is determined by a combination of the lens' FFD, which is measured in air, and any refractive elements between the lens and the camera's sensor. When light focused by the lens passes through a refractive element, instead of just travelling through air, the physical focal plane is shifted to longer distances by an amount that can be calculated. The adapter must add enough separation to compensate for both the camera's FFD, when it is too short, and the focal shift caused by any windows or filters inserted between the lens and sensor.
Flexiblity and Quick Fixes: Adjustable C-Mount Adapter Passively cooled Kiralux and Quantalux cameras consist of a camera with SM1 internal threads, a window or filter covering the sensor and secured by a retaining ring, and an adjustable C-mount adapter.
A benefit of the adjustable C-mount adapter is that it can tune the spacing between the lens and camera over a 1.8 mm range, when the window / filter and retaining ring are in place. Changing the spacing can compensate for different effects that otherwise misalign the camera's sensor plane and the lens' focal plane. These effects include material expansion and contraction due to temperature changes, positioning errors from tolerance stacking, and focal shifts caused by a substitute window or filter with a different thickness or refractive index.
Adjusting the camera's adapter may be necessary to obtain sharp images of objects at infinity. When an object is at infinity, the incoming rays are parallel, and location of the focus defines the FFD of the lens. Since the actual FFDs of lenses and cameras may not match their intended FFDs, the focal plane for objects at infinity may be shifted from the sensor plane, resulting in a blurry image.
If it is impossible to get a sharp image of objects at infinity, despite tuning the lens focus, try adjusting the camera's adapter. This can compensate for shifts due to tolerance and environmental effects and bring the image into focus.
Why can the FFD be smaller than the distance separating the camera's flange and sensor?
Flange focal distance (FFD) values for cameras and lenses assume only air fills the space between the lens and the camera's sensor plane. If windows and / or filters are inserted between the lens and camera sensor, it may be necessary to increase the distance separating the camera's flange and sensor planes to a value beyond the specified FFD. A span equal to the FFD may be too short, because refraction through windows and filters bends the light's path and shifts the focal plane farther away.
If making changes to the optics between the lens and camera sensor, the resulting focal plane shift should be calculated to determine whether the separation between lens and camera should be adjusted to maintain good alignment. Note that good alignment is necessary for, but cannot guarantee, an in-focus image, since new optics may introduce aberrations and other effects resulting in unacceptable image quality.
Figure 9: Refraction causes the ray's angle with the optical axis to be shallower in the medium than in air (θm vs. θo), due to the differences in refractive indices (nm vs. no ). After travelling a distance d in the medium, the ray is only hm closer to the axis. Due to this, the ray intersects the axis Δf beyond the f point.
Figure 11: Tolerance and / or temperature effects may result in the lens and camera having different FFDs. If the FFD of the lens is shorter, images of objects at infinity will be excluded from the focal range. Since the system cannot focus on them, they will be blurry.
Figure 10: When their flange focal distances (FFD) are the same, the camera's sensor plane and the lens' focal plane are perfectly aligned. Images of objects at infinity coincide with one limit of the system's focal range.
A Case of the Bends: Focal Shift Due to Refraction While travelling through a solid medium, a ray's path is straight (Figure 8). Its angle (θo ) with the optical axis is constant as it converges to the focal point (f ). Values of FFD are determined assuming this medium is air.
When an optic with plane-parallel sides and a higher refractive index (nm ) is placed in the ray's path, refraction causes the ray to bend and take a shallower angle (θm ) through the optic. This angle can be determined from Snell's law, as described in the table and illustrated in Figure 9.
While travelling through the optic, the ray approaches the optical axis at a slower rate than a ray travelling the same distance in air. After exiting the optic, the ray's angle with the axis is again θo , the same as a ray that did not pass through the optic. However, the ray exits the optic farther away from the axis than if it had never passed through it. Since the ray refracted by the optic is farther away, it crosses the axis at a point shifted Δf beyond the other ray's crossing. Increasing the optic's thickness widens the separation between the two rays, which increases Δf.
To Infinity and Beyond It is important to many applications that the camera system be capable of capturing high-quality images of objects at infinity. Rays from these objects are parallel and focused to a point closer to the lens than rays from closer objects (Figure 10). The FFDs of cameras and lenses are defined so the focal point of rays from infinitely distant objects will align with the camera's sensor plane. When a lens has an adjustable focal range, objects at infinity are in focus at one end of the range and closer objects are in focus at the other.
Different effects, including temperature changes and tolerance stacking, can result in the lens and / or camera not exactly meeting the FFD specification. When the lens' actual FFD is shorter than the camera's, the camera system can no longer obtain sharp images of objects at infinity (Figure 11). This offset can also result if an optic is removed from between the lens and camera sensor.
An approach some lenses use to compensate for this is to allow the user to vary the lens focus to points "beyond" infinity. This does not refer to a physical distance, it just allows the lens to push its focal plane farther away. Thorlabs' Kiralux™ and Quantalux® cameras include adjustable C-mount adapters to allow the spacing to be tuned as needed.
If the lens' FFD is larger than the camera's, images of objects at infinity fall within the system's focal range, but some closer objects that should be within this range will be excluded. This situation can be caused by inserting optics between the lens and camera sensor. If objects at infinity can still be imaged, this can often be acceptable.
Not Just Theory: Camera Design Example The C-mount, hermetically sealed, and TE-cooled Quantalux camera has a fixed 18.1 mm spacing between its flange surface and sensor plane. However, the FFD (f) for C-mount camera systems is 17.526 mm. The camera's need for greater spacing becomes apparent when the focal shift due to the window soldered into the hermetic cover and the glass covering the sensor are taken into account. The results recorded in the table beneath Figure 9 show that both exact and paraxial equations return a required total spacing of 18.1 mm.
The movement of Thorlabs' manual translation stages is driven by a micrometer or other adjuster, which can be replaced with a motorized actuator that has a compatible travel range and barrel diameter. Before making the substitution, it is important to fully retract the installed adjuster to protect the stage from the mechanical shock of a sudden release of spring energy.
Video Clip 1: It is important to completely retract the installed micrometer or other adjuster as the first step. If the adjuster is extended when it is released from the stage, the top plate of the stage will be propelled backwards into a hard stop. The mechanical shock may damage the stage.
Video Clip 3: After the micrometer on the XR25P stage is completely retracted, the locking cap screw on the stage's barrel clamp can be loosened with a 5/64" (2 mm) hex key and the adjuster removed. The barrel of the motorized actuator, which is the DC-servo-motor-driven Z825B in this example, is then inserted and the locking setscrew is tightened until snug.
Video Clip 2: After the adjustment screw on the MT1B stage is completely retracted, the locking cap screw on the stage's barrel clamp can be loosened with a 3/32" hex key and the adjuster removed. The barrel of the motorized actuator, which is the stepper-motor-driven ZFS13B in this example, is then inserted and the locking setscrew is tightened until snug.
Check Barrel Diameter and Travel Range Compatibility These stages secure the actuator using a barrel clamp, which makes it necessary to match the actuator's barrel diameter to the clamp's specifications. Both stages chosen for this demonstration accept actuators with a 3/8" (9.5 mm) diameter barrel.
The travel range of the actuator must not exceed that of the stage. An actuator with a larger travel range can potentially force the stage to extend beyond its limit, which may damage both the stage and the actuator's motor. An actuator with a shorter travel range will cause no mechanical harm to itself or the stage, but the stage's travel range will be reduced. The MT1B and XR25P linear translation stages included in this demonstration have travel ranges of 0.5" and 1" (13 mm and 25 mm), respectively.
Retract the Adjuster to Avoid Damaging the Stage Fully retracting the installed adjuster, before doing anything else, avoids a significant cause of damage to these stages. When the adjuster is fully retracted, the top plate is positioned as far backwards as possible to relieve the spring tension. Ideally, the tip of the adjuster would no longer be in contact with the stage.
An extended position is dangerous due to the force exerted by the stage's internal springs. The spring force keeps the top plate, or moving world, in contact with the tip of the adjuster (Clip 1). If the adjuster is extended when it is released from the stage, the spring force on the top plate will propel it backwards into a hard stop. The mechanical shock of this collision can be severe and potentially misalign the stage's components, affect the ball bearings, and introduce angular deviations to the stage's travel.
Make the Replacement With the installed adjuster completely retracted, the locking cap screw in the barrel clamp of the MT1B or XR25P stage can be loosened using a 3/32" or 5/64" (2 mm) hex key, respectively. This will release the holding force on the barrel of the adjuster, so that it can be removed (Clips 2 and 3).
Insert the barrel of the motorized actuator and tighten the locking cap screw until it is snug, but not too tight. The spring load on the top plate should not be able to push the actuator out of the barrel clamp, but the locking screw should not be so tight that it deforms the barrel, which could affect the linearity of the actuator.
Want additional Insights on translation stages? Watch the full video.
Figure 1: The DM713 digital micrometer (right) is included with and used to adjust the retardance provided by the SBC-VIS Soleil-Babinet compensator (left).
Digital micrometers, such as the DM713, are handy for moving a piece of optomech a specific distance. For example, a user might want to increment a translation stage holding a sample in front of an objective lens in order to focus the light to equally spaced points within the sample.
However, there are also times where the user might want to record the position of an event. One example could be making a distance measurement where the micrometer is set to a starting position, zeroed, and then translated the desired amount to display the distance.
Using the DM713 alone creates an extra step where the user has to read and record the display, which can be tedious in a dark lab where the display is not visible. One solution is to use Thorlabs' SBC-COMM, which includes an RS-232 interfacing cable. Thorlabs has created software application notes that walk the user through creating Visual C#® and LabVIEW® programs to continuously measure distances with the DM713.
Another solution is to purchase the Mitutoyo® 05CZA662 SPC cable and IT-016U USB input tool that provide a push button and USB interfacing cable. With this device the user can open any text entry software package, press the single push button, and the device acts like a keyboard to enter the number into the software.
Figure 1: Parabolic mirrors have a single focal point for all rays in a collimated beam.
Parabolic mirrors perform better than spherical mirrors when collimating light emitted by a point source or focusing a collimated beam.
Focusing Collimated Light Parabolic mirrors (Figure 1) focus all rays in an incoming, collimated light beam to a diffraction-limited spot. In contrast, concave spherical mirrors (Figure 2) concentrate incoming collimated light into a volume larger than a diffraction-limited spot. The size of the spherical mirror's focal volume can be reduced by decreasing the diameter of the incoming collimated beam.
Collimating Light from a Point Source A point source emits light in all directions. When this highly divergent light source is placed at the focal point of a parabolic mirror, the output beam is highly collimated. If the point source were ideal, all reflected rays would be perfectly parallel with one another.
When a point source is placed within a spherical mirror's focal volume, the output beam is not as well collimated as the beam provided by a parabolic mirror. Different rays from the point source are not perfectly parallel after reflection from the spherical mirror, but two reflected rays will be more nearly parallel when they reflect from more closely spaced points on the spherical mirror's surface. Consequently, the quality of the collimated beam can be improved by reducing the area of the reflective surface. This is equivalent to limiting the angular range over which the source in the focal volume emits light.
Choosing Between Parabolic and Spherical Mirrors A parabolic mirror is not always the better choice. Beam diameter, cost constraints, space limitations, and performance requirements of an application all influence selection. Beam diameter is a factor, since the performance of these two mirrors is more similar when the beam diameter is smaller. Parabolic mirrors are more expensive, since their reflective profiles are more difficult to fabricate. Parabolic mirrors are also typically larger. Improved performance may or may not be more important than the difference in cost and physical size.
Figure 3: The focal point of an on-axis parabolic mirror is close to the reflective surface, and typically surrounded by the reflective surface, which makes the focal point difficult to access.
Both symmetric parabolic and off-axis parabolic (OAP) mirrors have a single focal point. The benefit of an OAP mirror is that its focal point is accessible, unlike that of a symmetric parabolic mirror.
The single focal point is a primary benefit parabolic mirrors and is useful for a range of purposes, including imaging and manufacturing applications that require focusing laser light to a diffraction limited spot.
There are a few negatives associated using with using conventional parabolic mirrors, which are symmetric around the focal point (Figure 3). One is that the sides of the mirror generally obstruct access to the focus. Another is that when the mirror is used to collimate a divergent light source, the housing of the light source blocks a portion of the collimated beam. In particular, light emitted at small angles with respect to the optical axis of the mirror is typically obstructed.
An off-axis parabolic (OAP) mirror (Figure 4) is one solution to this problem. The reflective surface of this mirror is parabolic in shape, but it is not symmetric around the focal point. The reflective surface of the OAP corresponds to a section of the parent parabola that is shifted away from the focal point. The section chosen depends on the desired angle and / or distance between the focal point and the center of the mirror.
Figure 7: Choosing a section closer to the axis of the parabola results in a smaller off-axis angle.
The off-axis angle (θ ) of an OAP mirror is measured between the mirror's optical and focal axes. The angle depends on the segment of the parent parabola used for the OAP mirror, as well as the width (Figure 6) of the parent parabola. The OAP mirror in Figure 5 has a 90° angle.
Proximity of Parabolic Segment and Focal Point Choosing a segment of the parent parabola closer to the focal point reduces the off-axis angle. The mirror in Figure 7 has a smaller angle than the one in Figure 5, but the only difference between them is that the section of the parabola selected for the OAP mirror in Figure 7 is closer to the focal point.
The location of the parabolic segment also controls the focal length. Choosing a parabolic segment closer to the focal point results in a shorter distance between the center of the mirror and the focal point.
Width of the Parent Parabola Increasing the width of the parent parabola decreases the off-axis angle. This inverse relationship is illustrated by Figures 7 and 8. The width of the parabola is larger in Figure 7, and this is also the mirror with a smaller angle.
The width of the parent parabola also affects the focal length. The wider the parabola, the longer the focal length.
Available Off-Axis Angles OAP mirrors are often designed to have a 90° off-axis angle, but OAP mirrors with angles less than 90° are also common.
Figure 10: When the collimated beam is parallel to the optical axis of a parabolic or OAP mirror, the light focuses to a diffraction-limited spot.
Parabolic and off-axis parabolic (OAP) mirrors will only provide the expected well-collimated beam or diffraction-limited focal spot when the correct beam type is incident along the proper axis. This due to the parabolic shape of these mirrors' reflective surfaces, which are not symmetric around their focal points.
Parabolic vs. Off-Axis Parabolic Mirrors The reflective surface of an OAP mirror is a section of the parent parabola that is not centered on the parent's optical axis (Figure 9). A conventional parabolic mirror is illustrated in Figure 10.
The optical axis of an OAP mirror is parallel to, but displaced from the optical axis of the parent parabola. The focal point of the OAP mirror coincides with that of the parent parabola.
The focal axis of the OAP mirror passes through the focal point and the center of the OAP mirror. The focal and optical axes of an OAP mirror are not parallel. In contrast, these axes coincide for parabolic mirrors whose reflective surfaces are centered on optical axis of the parent parabola.
Focus Collimated Light If a parabolic or OAP mirror is being used to focus a beam of collimated light to a diffraction-limited point, the light must be directed along the mirror's optical axis (Figures 9 and 10).
Collimated light that is not directed parallel to the optical axis will not focus to a unique point (Figure 11).
Thorlabs recommends against directing collimated light along the focal axis of OAP mirrors, or along any direction that is not parallel to the optical axis, since the light will not focus to a diffraction-limited spot.
Collimate Light from a Point Source To obtain highly collimated light from a point source, the point source should be located at the mirror's focal point.
Light from a point source will be poorly collimated if the point source is placed along the OAP mirror's optical axis, or anywhere else that is not the focal point.
An OAP mirror can also be used to collimate a spherical wave, if its origin coincides with the focal point of the mirror.
Figure 13: The orientation of the optical axis can be found by noting it is perpendicular to the base of the mirror's substrate. The location of the focal point can be estimated by considering collimated light rays that are directed parallel to the optical axis. These rays reflect symmetrically around the local surface normals and pass through the mirror's focal point.
Figure 12: OAP mirrors have a flat, round base and a side that varies in height around the circumference. The planar base is normal to the mirror's optical axis. Shown above is the MPD2151-P01.
When working with off-axis parabolic (OAP) mirrors, it can be challenging to identify the optical and focal axes. This is particularly true when the parabolic curvature of the surface is hard to see (Figure 12).
The physical characteristics and dimensions of the mirror's substrate can provide a useful guide when positioning and aligning the mirror.
The mirror's substrate has a flat, round base. The optical axis is oriented normal to this planar base. Therefore, collimated light should be directed normal to the surface of the base.
The substrate has a tall side and a short side, and the reflective surface is sloped between them. The surface normal at different points across the reflector can be roughly estimated by visually examining the surface (Figure 13).
The location of the focal point can be estimated by considering a ray of collimated light, parallel to the optical axis, that reflects from the surface of the mirror. The incident ray reflects symmetrically about the surface normal. The reflected ray will pass through the focal point. By mentally tracing two rays from positions close to the tall and short sides of the mirror, respectively, it should be possible to estimate the location of the focal point.
Mounting and Alignment Features on Thorlabs' OAP Mirrors Thorlabs' OAP mirrors have an alignment hole and three tapped mounting holes machined into the bottom surface of their bases. The pattern of tapped holes matches the vertices of an equilateral triangle, and the position of the smooth-bore alignment hole indicates the short side of the OAP mirror. The tapped holes are designed to secure the mirror to mounting adapters or mounting platforms.
Figure 15: A pair of OAP mirrors can be used to couple light out of one fiber and into another. This provides access to the beam when it is necessary to insert bulk optics into the optical path. Due to the small dimension of the fiber core, light emitted from the fiber end face is similar to a point source.
Figure 14: A pair of OAP mirrors can be used in imaging applications, and/or to relay a beam across a distance.
Relay an Image A pair of OAP mirrors can act as a relay, as illustrated in Figures 14 and 15, since the light traveling between the mirrors is collimated. Since OAP mirrors are only designed to collimate light from a focal point, or focus collimated light, two mirrors should be used when neither the source nor the image light is collimated (finite conjugate imaging).
The dual OAP configuration facilitates the process of adjusting the distance between mirrors. The leg of collimated light is also convenient for inserting filters and other optical elements into the beam. Another benefit is that distance between the two mirrors can be adjusted to move the focal point across the source and/or target planes without disturbing the alignment of the system.
Provide Access to the Beam in a Fiber Network A pair of OAP mirrors can be used to create a free-space leg in an optical fiber system, which is one way to provide access to the light beam. The illustration in Figure 15 shows an example of this configuration, which can be useful when filters or other bulk optics need to be inserted into the beam path. The length of the free-space leg can be adjusted without disturbing alignment.
When setting up this system, the fibers' end faces must be aligned so that their cores coincide with the source and target focal points, respectively. The collimated beam paths of both mirrors should be co-linear and completely overlapping.
Figure 16: The shape of the OAP mirror's reflective profile matches a section of the parent parabola that is not centered on the focal point. Due to this, the OAP's reflective surface is not rotationally symmetric. When mounting the mirror, care should be taken to ensure the mirror does not rotate around its optical axis.
OAP mirrors are not rotationally symmetric. This is a consequence of their reflective surfaces being taken from sections of the parent parabola curve located away from the focal point (Figure 16). Due the asymmetry of the reflector, when an OAP mirror rotates, the position of its focal point also rotates. Since this could negatively impact the performance of an optical system, the mirror should be fixed so that the reflective surface cannot rotate around its optical axis.
The optical performance of the mirror is also sensitive to alignment drift with respect to the other five degrees of freedom. One way to protect against alignment drift is to use a fixed, rather than a kinematic, mount.
Using a shear plate interferometer can be helpful when aligning an OAP mirror to an input point source. The shear plate interferometer should intercept the output beam (Figure 17), to assess its collimation quality. Alignment is optimized when the quality of the collimated beam is optimized.
Directionality of OAP-Mirror-Based Reflective Collimators
The two ports on Thorlabs' reflective collimators are not interchangeable. One port accepts an optical fiber connector and requires the highly divergent light of a point source. The other port is designed solely for collimated, free-space light (Figure 18).
Figure 19: The reflective element of the collimator is an off-axis parabolic mirror. The mirror's substrate is highlighed in red. The shape of the reflective surface is a segment of the parabolic curve displaced from the vertex. The focal points of the parent parabola and the OAP mirror coincide.
Figure 18: Thorlabs offers reflective collimators that include a port for an optical fiber connector and a port for free space, collimated light that propagates parallel to the optical axis.
Free Space Port Light input to this port should be collimated and directed parallel to the optical axis. Diverging light from a fiber end face, a laser diode, or other source should not be input. This light would not be collimated at the fiber connector port or coupled into the fiber connected to the fiber port.
Optical Fiber Connector Port This port aligns the fiber's end face with the focal point of the mirror. Since the fiber's end face approximates a point source placed at the focal point, a collimated beam is output from the free-space port. The alignment of the fiber end face with the focal point is also the reason that all light input to the free-space light port should be collimated and directed parallel to the optical axis.
Source of Directionality The collimator's directionality is a consequence of using a non-rotationally symmetric, off-axis parabolic (OAP) mirror as the reflective element (Figure 19). The cut-away view illustrates that the fiber's end face is positioned at the focal point of the parent parabola, which is also the focal point of the OAP mirror.
How can the strength of a material's Faraday effect be measured?
Since the Faraday effect causes the polarization state of light to rotate as it propagates through a material in the presence of a magnetic field, one approach to determining the effect's strength in a material is to input linearly polarized light, apply a strong magnetic field through the material, and observe the induced change in the orientation of the output polarization state. It is not necessary to directly measure the output polarization state to determine the change in its orientation. Instead, the output light can be analyzed by measuring the optical power transmitted through a rotating linear polarizer. The measured power oscillates with a phase dependent on the orientation of the linear polarization state incident on the rotating polarizer. This was demonstrated using a CdMgTe crystal. Measurements of light output from the crystal were used to calculate its Verdet constant, which characterizes the strength of a material's Faraday effect.
Figure 1: Faraday effect measurements can be made with the sample placed between a linearly polarized light source and a polarization-sensitive detection system. The CdMgTe crystal was approximately a third of the length of the annulus magnet's bore, and the plastic sample holder was used to position and immobilize the crystal at the center of the bore. In the detection system, the optical power sensor was placed as close as possible to the output side of the linear polarizer, which was installed in an indexed rotation mount. An advantage of this setup is that it requires minimal alignment.
Figure 3: Optical power measurements were made while rotating the detection polarizer's transmission axis in 2° increments. Data were acquired with the magnet out of (triangles) and in (squares) the setup. Malus' law (solid lines) was used to model a to fit each curve. The phase shift (Δθ ) between the two curves is 36°.
Figure 2: The crystal under test was placed in the bore of the annulus magnet (left). The 2.2 mm long crystal was positioned in the center of the 6.35 mm long bore, where the magnetic field was strongest, most uniform, and directed along the N-S axis (right).
Curve Fit to Data Acquired Without Magnet
Curve Fit to Data Acquired With Magnet
Faraday Rotation (Δθ )
Faraday Rotation The rotation of the polarization state due to the Faraday effect is called the Faraday rotation, which is directly proportional to both the magnetic field strength (B ) in the material and the physical distance (L ) the light propagates through the material in the presence of the field. The proportionality constant is called the Verdet constant (V ).
This intrinsic material parameter, which is wavelength and temperature dependent, characterizes the strength of the material's Faraday effect. When the Verdet constant is known, the Faraday rotation (Δθ ),
due to different magnetic field strengths and material lengths can be calculated. One approach to obtaining the Verdet constant is to measure the Faraday rotation for a specific material length and a known magnetic field strength.
Faraday Effect Measurement Using this approach, and the setup illustrated in Figure 1, the strength of a CdMgTe crystal's Faraday effect was measured.
The linearly polarized light source consisted of a collimated fiber-coupled laser whose 785 nm emission was transmitted through a fixed linear polarizer.
An annulus super magnet was used in order to provide a magnetic field strong enough to induce a measurable Faraday rotation. The crystal was mounted in the center of the magnet's bore, as that is where the magnetic field is the strongest (Figure 2).
The light output from the crystal was transmitted through a second linear polarizer, which was secured in an indexed rotation mount, and to a power sensor. The power sensor was positioned as close as possible to the output side of the linear polarizer.
Two measurement sets were acquired, one with, and the other without, the magnet in the setup. Each data set (Figure 3) recorded average power measurements taken at 2° increments of the second linear polarizer's transmission axis angle. The curves oscillate with the same period but are phase shifted (Δθ ) from one another.
Calculate the Verdet Constant The phase shift between the two curves plotted in Figure 3 is the Faraday rotation. It can be determined after each data curve is fit using Malus' law,
in which Io is the intensity of the incident light and is the angle of the second linear polarizer's transmission axis. The fit parameter (θ ) is a constant that was optimized individually (θbase and θmag, respectively, in the table) for each data set. The difference in the two fit parameters is the Faraday rotation (36°). Using this Faraday rotation value, the Verdet constant can be calculated,
The magnetic field strength (B ) was 5800 Gauss at the center of the magnet's bore, the crystal's length (L ) was 0.22 cm, and the Faraday rotation angle (Δθ = 36°) was multiplied by a factor of 60 to convert it to 2160 arcmin.
Content contributed by and based on work performed by Zoya Shafique. Date of Last Edit: Jan. 14, 2021
Figure 2: Typical absorption coefficients and penetration depths for silicon, germanium, and indium gallium arsenide (In0.53Ga0.47As) are plotted. The penetration depth is the reciprocal of the absorption coefficient.
Figure 1: Different wavelengths of light have different average penetration depths into the PN-junction based detector. The penetration depth is related to the wavelength-dependent absorption coefficient (Figure 2).
When light is incident upon a photodiode, the photons that do not reflect due to the Fresnel reflection from the air / semiconductor interface will travel through the semiconductor material.
A photon will continue to travel until it is absorbed or it reaches the end. When a photon is absorbed, a charge carrier pair will be generated.
Charge carriers generated within the depletion region can contribute almost immediately to photocurrent. However, carriers generated outside of the depletion region must take the extra step of traveling to the depletion region. The duration of this travel is the diffusion time. In Figure 1, the blue and red photons generate carriers in the P-type and N-type regions, respectively. These must diffuse to the depletion region.
The probability of a photon being absorbed once it enters the semiconductor is based on the absorption coefficient. The wavelength-dependent absorption coefficient and penetration depth for various detector materials is shown in Figure 2.
As the incident wavelength increases, the absorption coefficient decreases. This means a longer-wavelength photon can travel a longer average distance within the semiconductor before being absorbed and generating a charge carrier pair. The greater the distance a charge carrier needs to travel to reach the depletion region, the longer the rise time.
Figures 3 through 5 show the measured rise times for a selection of silicon, InGaAs, and germanium photodiodes. In the silicon plot, the slopes of the curves are nearly flat for wavelengths <800 nm. This suggests that the diffusion time for photons absorbed near the surface is negligible. After 800 nm, the rise time increases exponentially. Since the penetration depth for silicon at 800 nm is 9 µm (Figure 2), this suggests that the distance from the top of the sensor and the bottom of the depletion region is less than 9 µm.
Does PM fiber preserve every input polarization state?
No polarization-maintaining (PM) fiber preserves an arbitrary input polarization state. Typical PM fiber only preserves the polarization state of input light that is both linearly polarized and polarized parallel to one of the fiber's two orthogonal axes. The orientation of the linearly polarized light input to the PM fiber matters, since the refractive indices of its two orthogonal axes are different. Light polarized along the high-index direction (slow axis) travels more slowly than light polarized along the orthogonal direction (fast axis).
If the input polarization state does not meet these criteria, the light output from the fiber will be elliptically polarized. However, the elliptical polarization state cannot be predicted and is not stable, since it depends on the fluctuating temperature and stress conditions over the length of the fiber.
Figure 1: Polarimeter measurements of light output by a PM fiber patch cable are plotted on a Poincaré sphere. The points indicated by the arrows result when there is optimal alignment between the linearly polarized input and one of the fiber's axes. These input states are preserved by the fiber. All other points correspond to the elliptically polarized output states resulting when the input light's polarization direction is not parallel with one of the fiber's axes.
PM Fibers Do Not Polarize Light A PM fiber does not behave like a linear polarizer, and a PM fiber will not convert an arbitrary input polarization state into a linearly polarized output state.
A linear polarizer has two orthogonal axes, but these are not the slow and fast axes of a PM fiber. In the case of a linear polarizer, the light polarized parallel to one of the axes is attenuated, while the light polarized parallel to the other is transmitted. Since only one polarization component is transmitted, the output light is linearly polarized.
Because a PM fiber transmits both orthogonal polarization components, instead of attenuating one, PM fiber cannot be used as a linear polarizer.
Comparison with Wave Plates Since PM fibers and wave plates both have fast and slow axes, they have a lot in common. If the polarization axis of a linearly polarized light beam is aligned parallel to either the slow or the fast axis, both PM fibers and wave plates will preserve that polarization state. However, if the input beam has components polarized along both slow and fast axes, neither a PM fiber nor a wave plate will preserve the input polarization state.
Both PM fibers and wave plates change the polarization state of a light beam by delaying the component of light polarized parallel to the slow axis more than the component polarized parallel to the fast axis. But, a PM fiber cannot be used to replace a wave plate, since the delay induced by the PM fiber fluctuates unpredictably as the temperature and stress applied over the length of the fiber changes.
Output Polarization States The polarimeter measurements plotted on the Poincaré sphere in Figure 1 illustrate the range of elliptically polarized output states a PM fiber patch cable can provide, when the input is a linearly polarized beam with arbitrary orientation to the fiber's axes. The polarimeter measurement of the output light has one of the two values indicated by the black arrows, when the fiber preserves the input polarization state. These values result when there is optimal alignment between the polarization direction of the input polarization state and one of the fiber's axes. All other points on the sphere indicate elliptical output polarization states occurring when the input polarization state is not aligned parallel to either fiber axis.
Each data trace in the figure was generated by rotating the polarization direction of the linearly polarized input light once around the optical axis. The traces do not overlap, since the temperature of the fiber was changed after every rotation. Each temperature change resulted in a different set of elliptically polarized output states, due to the fiber's temperature sensitivity. Note that each data trace crosses the points indicated by the arrows. This indicates that when the linearly polarized input state is well-aligned to one of the fiber's axes, the output polarization state is not sensitive to changes in temperature and applied stress.
How does polarization-maintaining fiber preserve linearly polarized light?
There is a significant refractive index difference (birefringence) between the orthogonal "slow" and "fast" axes of a polarization-maintaining (PM) fiber, and this birefringence is the reason PM fiber is effective in preserving the polarization state of input linearly polarized light. However, the input linear polarization state can only be preserved if it is aligned parallel to one of the fiber's axes.
Because PM fibers are birefringent, there are different velocity, or more accurately propagation constant, requirements for light polarized parallel to the fiber's slow vs. fast axes. In order for light to switch to being polarized parallel to the orthogonal axis, the light would have to change its velocity (propagation constant) to meet the requirements of the orthogonal axis. This creates such a barrier that a switch is unlikely to occur unless the fiber's birefringence is reduced.
Figure 3: Bow-tie polarization-maintaining fibers use two wedge-shaped stress rods to place the core in tension and make it birefringent. The stress is directed along the slow axis, and it results from the stress rods contracting more than the cladding as the fiber cooled after fabrication.
Figure 2: PANDA polarization-maintaining fiber uses two cylindrical stress rods to place the core in tension, making it birefringent. The stress, which is directed along the slow axis, results from the stress rods contracting more than the cladding as the fiber cooled after fabrication.
Figure 4: To minimize microbends, spool fiber by winding it loosely in parallel rows (top). Microbends result from winding fiber so that it crosses over the bumpy surface created by deeper layers of the wound fiber (bottom).
A Stressful Situation One approach to creating a PM fiber is to apply a mechanical stress to the fiber's core, since stress causes glass to become birefringent (photoelasticity). The two most common stress-birefringent fibers, PANDA and bow-tie, apply tension to the fiber's core.
In these designs, glass structures called stress rods extend down the length of the fiber, parallel to fiber's core. In cross section, the stress rods and the core of the fiber are linearly arranged, as shown in Figures 2 and 3. As the fiber cools after fabrication, the glass in the stress rods contracts more than the glass in the surrounding cladding. The pull from the contraction of the stress rods creates a line of tension (slow axis) across the core, with comparatively little stress applied in the orthogonal direction (fast axis). This creates an index difference between the two axes.
Stress Relief is not Always a Good Thing The tension across the core in stress-birefringent PM fibers is temperature dependent, since the stress results from the glass in the stress rods and the glass in the cladding having different rates of thermal expansion (CTEs). The tension provided by the stress rods decreases as the operating temperature increases. Since this reduces the birefringence, and therefore the fiber's ability to preserve polarization, it can result in a reduced extinction ratio (ER).
The tension in the core can also be reduced by stress from handling, such as coiling the fiber in a small-diameter ring, routing it around sharp corners, and fixing it to a bumpy surface. Microbends at localized stress points scatter light into the orthogonal polarization state, which reduces ER. Winding a fiber across itself (Figure 4), or pressing a bare fiber against a surface, can cause microbending.
Attaching fiber connectors typically reduces ER, since the cured potting compound that secures the fiber can induce asymmetric stress, hardened bubbles within the compound can press into the fiber, and there can be contact between the fiber and the ferrule's bore. To increase the maximum ER the fiber can provide, manufacturers typically take steps to suppress these sources of stress, but they cannot be eliminated.
Form is Function If the temperature-dependence of stress-birefringent fibers is unacceptable, form-birefringent fibers offer a largely temperature-insensitive alternative. These PM fibers are birefringent due to their elliptically shaped cores, rather than tension induced by stress rods (Figure 5).
Form-birefringent fibers, which include PM photonic crystal fibers, are not well-suited to every application. Their elliptical cores, attenuation, and small mode sizes are not ideal for telecommunications applications, and they find most use in fiber optic sensors.
References  Chris Emslie, in Specialty Optical Fibers Handbook, edited by Alexis Mendez and T. F. Morse (Elsevier, Inc., New York, 2007) pp. 243-277.  Malcolm P. Varnham et al., "Analytic Solution for the Birefringence Produced by Thermal Stress in Polarization-Maintaining Optical Fibers," J. Lightwave Technol., LT-1(2), 332-339 (1983).  Zhenyang Ding et al., "Accurate Method for Measuring the Thermal Coefficient of Group Birefringence of Polarization-Maintaining Fibers," Opt. Lett., 36(11), 2173-2175 (2011).  M. Shah Alam and Sarkar Rahat M. Anwar, "Modal Propagation Properties of Elliptical Core Optical Fibers Considering Stress-Optic Effects," World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Open Science Index 44, International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 4(8), 1170 - 1175 (2010).
Figure 6: Due to the effects of cross talk, PM fibers typically output light that is slightly elliptically polarized. Varying the temperature applied to a PM fiber will change the output elliptical polarization state in a controlled manner. The polarization measurement values will trace a circle on the Poincaré sphere and can be used to characterize the output light.
Figure 7: Three different data traces, each corresponding to a different angular mismatch between input linear polarization state and PM fiber axis, are plotted on a Poincaré sphere. Each trace was acquired while using a heat gun to vary the fiber's temperature, which cycled the output polarization state. As the angular mismatch decreased, the range of temperature-dependent polarization states decreased, and the extinction ratio increased. Extinction ratios are given for each trace in decibels (dB)
The extinction ratio (ER) of the light output from a PANDA and bow-tie polarization-maintaining (PM) fiber will be reduced, relative to the ER of input light, due to a combination of non-ideal coupling conditions, the effects of external stress applied to the fiber, and interactions between the light and fiber imperfections. All can worsen (decrease) the ER by transferring some light to the orthogonal polarization state.
Approximate Cross Talk Due to Misalignment Cross talk (cross coupling) occurs when some fraction of light becomes polarized parallel to the orthogonal direction. Coupling light into a PM fiber can cause cross talk if there is misalignment (rotation) between the polarization axes of the source and the fiber. In this case, the linearly polarized light from the source would be split between two orthogonally polarized components, which are guided separately by the slow and fast axes of the fiber.
Cross talk due to misalignment can be significant, and it can be estimated by varying the fiber's temperature while measuring the output polarization state. If the output light includes both orthogonally polarized components, the delay between them will vary with temperature. This will cause the output light's elliptical polarization to vary with temperature.
When the temperature-dependent polarization measurements are plotted on a Poincaré sphere, they will trace out a circle (Figures 6 and 7). The approximate value of cross talk due to misalignment can be found from the angle (2φ) of the arc from the point at the circle's center to a point on its circumference.
If the point in the center of the circle is used as a reference, the angle 2φ is the incremental ellipticity needed to reach the circle's circumference. When the half-angle (φ ) is expressed in radians, the approximate amount of cross talk in decibels is,
Cross Talk (dB) ≈ -20 log (tan(φ )).
One way to improve the alignment between the source and fiber is to rotate the polarization angle of the source around the optical axis until the temperature-dependent fluctuations in the fiber's output polarization state are minimized.
Approximating ER of the Output Light A minimal amount of cross talk will occur as the light propagates down the fiber and interacts with fiber imperfections, but externally applied stress can significantly reduce the ER. Small diameter coils, tightly winding the fiber over bumpy or sharp features, and fixing the bare fiber against hard surfaces can also lower the ER. Fiber connectors can also be a significant source of cross talk, due to the stresses arising from interactions among the bare fiber, connector ferrule, and potting compound.
The extinction ratio (ER) can be calculated using different approximations. One,
ERδ (dB) ≈ -20 log (tan(φ + |δ |)).
is similar to the equation used to calculate cross talk due to misalignment but includes cross talk arising from fiber imperfections, microbends, and other perturbations distributed along the length of the fiber. These effects displace the center of the circular trace from the equator of the Poincaré sphere by an angle 2δ. A more exact approximation,
takes into account the degree of polarization (DOP), which is the intensity of polarized light divided by the total light intensity.
References  Chris Emslie, in Specialty Optical Fibers Handbook, edited by Alexis Mendez and T. F. Morse (Elsevier, Inc., New York, 2007) pp. 243-277.  Edward Collett, Polarized Light in Fiber Optics (Elsevier, Inc., New York, 2007) pp. 45-53.
What is beat length and why is it often specified for PM fiber, instead of polarization extinction ratio?
It is difficult for manufacturers to specify a polarization extinction ratio (PER) for light output by polarization-maintaining (PM) fibers, since this parameter depends on the length of the fiber, how it is routed, and the polarization and alignment of the input light. Beat length is independent of these factors, which makes it a convenient parameter for quantifying the fiber's potential to preserve polarization. A smaller beat length is better, and it is a useful parameter to reference when choosing a PM fiber and its operating temperature. While beat length provides information about a PM fiber's potential to perform well, its actual performance and the PER of the light output by the fiber ultimately depend on the details of the fiber's deployment.
Figure 8: The blue and green curves represent waves polarized parallel to the PM fiber's slow and fast axes, respectively. Since the two axes' refractive indices are different, the two waves oscillate at different rates with respect to the distance along the fiber's optical axis (gray line). The beat length is the distance, measured in air, between the two red spheres, in which the sphere on the left selects a reference phase for the two waves (0° in this example), and the sphere on the right marks the next time both waves are again at this same reference phase. As long as the fiber's birefringence remains constant, the beat length is the same at any location along the length of the fiber.
Beat Length of a PM Fiber The beat length of a PM fiber is found by comparing waves propagating along the fiber's two orthogonal axes, fast and slow. These waves can be provided by a single, monochromatic, linearly polarized beam whose polarization angle is oriented midway between the orientations of the fiber's fast and slow axes. The orthogonally polarized waves oscillate with the same phase before, but not after, entering the fiber. Since the refractive index of the slow axis is greater than that of the fast axis (nslow > nfast ), the wave polarized parallel to the slow axis will oscillate with a shorter period than the wave polarized parallel to the fast axis.
The phases of these two sinusoidal waves cycle through angles from 0 to 2 (0° to 360°). But, the two waves do not stay in phase with one another as they propagate (Figure 8). The wave polarized parallel to the slow axis cycles more times per unit distance, where "distance" refers to the length measured in air.
The beat length is a measure of how often the difference between the two waves' phases cycles through a full 2. This is illustrated in Figure 8, in which both waves happen to have a phase of 0° at the origin. The beat length is the distance between this reference point and the next point at which both waves simultaneously return to the phases they had at the reference point. Beat length (Lp ),
is proportional to wavelength () and inversely proportional to the fiber's birefringence (B = nslow - nfast ).
Typical Beat Lengths The larger the refractive index difference between the two fiber axes, the larger the birefringence, the shorter the beat length, and the better the polarization-preserving performance of the fiber. The beat length remains constant along the length of the fiber, as long as the fiber's birefringence does not change. Manufacturers often specify beat length for selected wavelengths and limited temperature ranges.
To date, PM fibers with beat lengths <1 mm have had elliptical cores and mode field diameters (MFDs) significantly smaller than those of standard single mode optical fibers. Many applications require fibers with circular cores and MFDs close to those of standard single mode fibers. Typical PM fibers that meet these criteria and perform well have beat lengths between 1 mm and a few millimeters. It is interesting to note that standard single mode fibers also have measurable beat lengths, although they are meters long. This is due to their cores not having a perfectly circular cross section. Since the ellipticity of their cores is slight and changes randomly along the length of the fiber, standard single mode fibers are not useful as PM fibers.
The Amplitude Does not Beat In the case of PM fibers, beat length refers to a repeating phase relationship between waves polarized parallel to the orthogonal slow and fast axes of a PM fiber. The sum of these waves at any point along the fiber determines the polarization state of the light beam at that point. For example, when the waves are in phase, the light is linearly polarized, and the waves are out of phase by /2 (90°), the light is circularly polarized.
An amplitude beat pattern does not occur, since these waves are polarized orthogonal to one another. Two waves only produce an amplitude beat pattern when they have components polarized parallel to one another. For the same reason, a signal with an interference term equal to zero will result when a photodetector is used to measure the combined intensity of two orthogonally polarized waves with different periods.
References  Chris Emslie, in Specialty Optical Fibers Handbook, edited by Alexis Mendez and T. F. Morse (Elsevier, Inc., New York, 2007) pp. 243-277.  Malcolm P. Varnham et al., "Analytic Solution for the Birefringence Produced by Thermal Stress in Polarization-Maintaining Optical Fibers," J. Lightwave Technol., LT-1(2), 332-339 (1983).
Figure 9: The PANDA PM fiber has stress rods embedded in its cladding. These cylinders are aligned parallel to the core. Since the glass of the stress rods contracts more than the surrounding cladding as the fiber cools from fabrication temperatures, the core is pulled in tension along the slow axis.
Figure 11: Since the effect of the temperature-dependent birefringence dominates in Figure 10, the red trace from that figure is plotted alone to better show its range. These values were calculated using the assumption that the length of the fiber increases with temperature, while the fiber's birefringence remains constant with temperature.
Figure 10: The relative delay (y-axis) between orthogonal polarization components propagating through a PANDA PM fiber changes as the fiber's temperature changes (x-axis). As the temperature increases, the polarization-maintaining performance decreases. Performance is improved by reducing the temperature. The blue and red traces were calculated using the assumption that only the birefringence or fiber length, respectively, changed with temperature.
The larger the refractive index difference between the orthogonal slow and fast polarization axes of a polarization-maintaining (PM) fiber, the better its PM performance. However, the magnitude of this difference (birefringence) decreases with increasing temperature, since the thermally dependent tension across the core drops with increasing temperature. The decrease in the fiber's birefringence is approximately proportional to the increase in temperature.
Temperature-Dependent Birefringence Stress-birefringent PM fibers like PANDA and bow-tie fibers have stress rods embedded in their claddings (Figure 9). Since the stress rod's glass has a higher coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) than the cladding's glass, the glass in the stress rods contracts at a higher rate than the rest of the cladding as the fiber cools immediately after fabrication. Due to their greater contraction, the stress rods pull on the surrounding cladding, which places the core under significant tension around room temperature. This creates birefringence in the fiber's core.
A proportionality constant () relates the birefringence (B ),
to the difference between the temperature of the glass when it transitions between its liquid and glassy states (To , the fictive temperature), and the operating temperature (T ).
Estimating the Impact of Temperature If all of the light propagating in a PM fiber is polarized parallel to the same fiber axis, the polarization state of the light output by the fiber will be independent of temperature. If the light includes components polarized parallel to each of the fiber's axes, changing the operating temperature will change the elliptical polarization state of the light output by the fiber.
This is due to the relative delay between the two orthogonal components determining the output polarization state. That delay depends on the fiber's birefringence and the length of the fiber, which are both temperature dependent. But, only the change in birefringence significantly affects the fiber's polarization-maintaining performance.
Estimates of the relative significance of these two effects on the output polarization state were calculated using the equations in the table, a 1550 nm operating wavelength, and a 2 m length (L ) of PANDA PM fiber (PM980-XP), whose beat length is ~2.7 mm. The coefficient was assumed to be -5.6 x 10-7 . A fused silica glass fiber core, with a CTE of 5.5 x 10-7/°C, was also assumed.
The calculated results are plotted in Figures 10 and 11. The delay changes (y-axis), when the temperature changes (x-axis). This indicates that monitoring the temperature-dependent delay can provide information about the fiber's temperature-dependent birefringence and the fiber's potential to preserve polarization.
Temperature and Beat Length While the fiber's birefringence determines the strength of a PM fiber's ability to preserve polarization, birefringence is not usually specified by the manufacturer. Beat length is a related and typically specified parameter. The beat length (Lp),
is the ratio of wavelength () and birefringence and is shorter for higher-performance PM fibers. Note that for stress-birefringent PM fibers, beat length increases with temperature.
References  Chris Emslie, in Specialty Optical Fibers Handbook, edited by Alexis Mendez and T. F. Morse (Elsevier, Inc., New York, 2007) pp. 243-277.  Malcolm P. Varnham et al., "Analytic Solution for the Birefringence Produced by Thermal Stress in Polarization-Maintaining Optical Fibers," J. Lightwave Technol., LT-1(2), 332-339 (1983).  Zhenyang Ding et al., "Accurate Method for Measuring the Thermal Coefficient of Group Birefringence of Polarization-Maintaining Fibers," Opt. Lett., 36(11), 2173-2175 (2011).  M. Cavillon, P. D. Dragic, and J. Ballato, "Additivity of the coefficient of thermal expansion in silicate optical fibers," Opt. Lett, 42(18), 3650 - 3653 (2017).
Labels Used to Identify Perpendicular and Parallel Components
Senkrecht (s) is 'perpendicular' in German. Parallel begins with 'p.'
TE: Transverse electric field. TM: Transverse magnetic field. The transverse field is perpendicular to the plane of incidence. Note that electric and magnetic fields are orthogonal.
⊥ and // are symbols for perpendicular and parallel, respectively.
The Greek letters corresponding to s and p are σ and π, respectively.
A sagittal plane is a longitudinal plane that divides a body.
Figure 1: Polarized light is often described as the vector sum of two components: one whose electric field oscillates in the plane of incidence (parallel), and one whose electric field oscillates perpendicular to the plane of incidence. Note that the oscillations of the electric field are also orthogonal to the beam's propagation direction.
When polarized light is incident on a surface, it is often described in terms of perpendicular and parallel components. These are orthogonal to each other and the direction in which the light is propagating (Figure 1).
Labels and symbols applied to the perpendicular and parallel components can make it difficult to determine which is which. The table identifies, for a variety of different sets, which label refers to the perpendicular component and which to the parallel.
The perpendicular and parallel directions are referenced to the plane of incidence, which is illustrated in Figure 1 for a beam reflecting from a surface. Together, the incident ray and the surface normal define the plane of incidence, and the incident and reflected rays are both contained in this plane. The perpendicular direction is normal to the plane of incidence, and the parallel direction is in the plane of incidence.
The electric fields of the perpendicular and parallel components oscillate in planes that are orthogonal to one another. The electric field of the perpendicular component oscillates in a plane perpendicular to the plane of incidence, while the electric field of the parallel component oscillated in the plane of incidence. The polarization of the light beam is the vector sum of the perpendicular and parallel components.
Normally Incident Light Since a plane of incidence cannot be defined for normally incident light, this approach cannot be used to unambiguously define perpendicular and parallel components of light. There is limited need to make the distinction, since under conditions of normal incidence the reflectivity is the same for all components of light.
Figure 3: As the electric field () propagates, the tip of the vector follows a helical path. In this case, propagation is along the z-axis, and the helicity of the path followed by the vector is positive (clockwise rotation).
Figure 4: If an observer looks into the beam propagating from the origin in Figure 3, the tip of the rotating electric field vector traces out an ellipse. The ellipse can be described in terms of angles Ψ and χ. The equations in this figure use () to represent (/λ - ωt), where λ is the material-dependent wavelength, ω is frequency, and t is time.
The polarization ellipse is a way to visualize the polarization state.
As a laser beam propagates, the tip of its electric field vector moves along a three dimensional path determined by the polarization state. If an observer looking into the beam could see the electric field advancing in real time, the vector's tip would appear to cycle around the propagation axis while following a two-dimensional, elliptical track.
The shape of this track is the polarization ellipse, which becomes a line for linearly polarized light and a circle for circularly polarized light.
Components of Light The electric field vector () can be described by its orthogonal components, Ex and Ey. Figure 2 illustrates a case of elliptically polarized light, in which the polarization is not linear or circular. The Ex and Ey components have different amplitudes, and the phase difference (δ ) between the Ex and Ey components is not an integer multiple of /2. The Ex and Ey components' values increase and decrease periodically, but they vary out of sync with one another and span different ranges.
If the orthogonal components were added together as vectors, the total field vector would rotate around the propagation axis as it traveled (Figure 3), and its length would vary with the rotation angle. Looking into the beam, perpendicular to the Ex - Ey plane, the tip of the vector would trace out the curve of the polarization ellipse (Figure 4).
Polarization Ellipse An observer looking into the beam will describe a different polarization ellipse than an observer facing the opposite direction. Due to this, it is necessary to specify the direction the observer faces. Here, the observer is assumed to be looking into the beam.
The polarization ellipse is bound by a rectangle whose sides are equal to twice the amplitudes, Eox and Eoy , of the Ex and Ey components, respectively. This rectangle provides information about the fraction of the light contained in each orthogonal component.
To determine the specific characteristics of the polarization ellipse corresponding to a polarization state, the phase delay between the Ex and Ey components must also be considered. Key characteristics of the ellipse providing polarization state information are the rotation of the major axis with respect to the Ex axis and the relative lengths of the minor and major axes.
The angle (ψ ) between the major axis of the ellipse and the Ex axis is known by many names, including orientation angle, angle of inclination, rotation, tilt, and azimuth. It varies between -90° and 90°, and it is ±45° when Eox and Eoy have equal magnitudes.
The ellipticity of the polarization ellipse is the ratio (ε ) between the lengths of the minor and major axes. Since the orientation is typically stated as an angle, it can be convenient to also express ellipticity as an angle ( χ ). The ellipticity has a range of values from zero ( χ = 0°) for linearly polarized light, which is the case for δ = 0, to one ( χ = 45°) for circularly polarized light, which is the case for δ = /2.
The tip of the electric field vector may rotate in a right-hand (clockwise) or left-hand (counterclockwise) direction as it propagates. This is known as the handedness or helicity of light, in which right-hand polarized light has positive helicity and left-hand polarized light has negative helicity. The direction can be determined using values of the E vector at time equal to zero (Et=0 ) and at a time one quarter of a period (T ) later (Et=T/4 ). If the cross product (Et=0 x Et=T/4 ) points in the direction of beam propagation, the rotation is counterclockwise (left handed). If not, the rotation of the E-field vector is clockwise (right handed).
Figure 5: The ellipticity and orientation of the polarization ellipse provides information about the phase shift (δ ) between the Ex and Ey components of the electric field. The ellipses shown above result when the peak amplitudes of both components are the same. The direction of the E vector's rotation is indicated by the direction of the arrow on the polarization ellipse. Click the image to see ellipticity and orientation angles for each case.
Figure 6: Polarization states are mapped to the Poincaré sphere using azimuthal and ellipticity angles, from the S1 axis and the equator, respectively. The state's radius is largest when the light is completely polarized (no fraction is unpolarized).
Figure 7: States (blue circles) mapped to the equator (blue curve) of the spherical surface are perfectly linearly polarized. States (green circles) mapped to a value of ±1 on the S3 axis are circularly polarized. All elliptical polarization states that are not linearly or circularly polarized are mapped to other regions of the sphere.
Polarization states are mapped to the Poincaré sphere using an approach similar to the system of latitude and longitude used to locate points on the Earth's globe. The coordinates of points across and within the Poincarré sphere are specified using two angular values (azimuth and ellipticity) and a radius. The azimuth and ellipticity parameters are taken from the polarization ellipse representation of the polarization state. The radius is determined by the light's degree of polarization and has a maximum value of one, which corresponds to perfectly polarized light.
Both the Poincaré sphere and polarization ellipse are useful for visualizing a polarization state and observing its evolution. However, a key benefit of the spherical representation is that it simplifies the math needed to calculate incremental changes in polarization state.
Data Points on the Poincaré Sphere The azimuthal angle (2ψ ), which is sometimes known as the orientation, is a value between ±/2 and is measured from the S1 axis, as shown in Figure 6. The ellipticity (2χ ) is an angular value between ±/4 and is measured from the equator of the sphere as shown. Points on the equator correspond to linearly polarized light, points at the poles represent circularly polarized light (Figure 7), and points on the rest of the sphere indicate other elliptical polarization states.
A radius of one corresponds to the surface of the sphere and indicates the light is completely polarized. The radius decreases as the fraction of unpolarized light increases. The degree of polarization (DOP) is the intensity of polarized light divided by the total light intensity.
The Stokes parameters (S1, S2, S3) of the polarization state correspond to the state's Cartesian coordinates (see the table below).
From One State to Another Any two polarization state values plotted on the surface of the Poincaré sphere can be connected by a single arc, and the difference in the two states' azimuth and ellipticity can be calculated using spherical trigonometry. This provides a convenient way to predict the polarization state of light after interaction with a polarizing element, as well as to determine the azimuth and ellipticity of the polarizing element required to provide a desired polarization state.
Cartesian to Poincaré Sphere Coordinates
S1 = cos(2χ)*cos(2ψ)
S2 = cos(2χ)sin(2ψ)
S3 = sin(2χ)
Selected Polarization States
Stokes Parameters (S1, S2, S3)
ψ = 0
χ = 0
(1, 0, 0)
χ = 0
(0, 1, 0)
ψ = /2
χ = 0
(-1, 0, 0)
ψ = 3/4
χ = 0
(0, -1, 0)
ψ = 0
χ = /4
(0, 0, 1)
ψ = 0
χ = -/4
(0, 0, -1)
The azimuthal angle (ψ) and ellipticity (χ) are parameters of both the Poincaré sphere and the polarization ellipse.
References  Edward Collett, Polarized Light in Fiber Optics (Elsevier, Inc., New York, 2007) pp. 45-53.  Russell A. Chipman, Wai-Sze Tiffany Lam, and Garam Young, Polarized Light and Optical Systems (CRC Press, New York, 2019) pp. 80-83.
Is there a rule for choosing the mirror's diameter based on the laser beam's diameter?
The diameter of the laser beam should be significantly smaller than the clear aperture of the mirror (Figure 1). A general rule restricts the diameter of the beam to no more than a third of the mirror's diameter. This limits the risk of introducing aberrations into the beam, which will occur if it interacts with the coating boundary near the perimeter of the surface and / or is clipped by the edge of the optic.
Figure 1: The clear aperture of the mirror should have a larger diameter than the beam. A general rule recommends the mirror's diameter be at least a factor of three larger than the beam's 1/e2 diameter.
Figure 2: A larger-diameter mirror provides the flexibility to preserve optical beam quality despite situations in which the laser spot is not perfectly centered on the mirror or is elongated due to oblique incidence.
Beam Diameter and Optical Power When the laser beam has a Gaussian intensity profile, it is common to measure its diameter across the 1/e2 intensity points. If a visible wavelength beam is observed, the 1/e2 diameter generally appears to enclose the beam. However, the intensity of the beam is 13.5% of the peak intensity along the 1/e2 perimeter, and there is measurable power beyond this diameter.
A mirror would optimally have a diameter (D ) large enough to reflect all of the beam's power. The fraction of the reflected optical power (PT ),
can be calculated using D and the 1/e2 beam intensity diameter (d ), or using the mirror's radius (r ) and the 1/e2 beam intensity radius (w ). 
When the diameter of the mirror is a factor of 1.52 larger than the beam's 1/e2 diameter, the mirror can reflect 99% of the power. Increasing the mirror's diameter to twice the beam's diameter will reflect over 99.96% of the power. If the beam is not perfectly centered on the mirror, the fraction of reflected light will be lower.
Beam Position and Clear Aperture The mirror's optical performance is specified over the area of the clear aperture, which typically includes all but a thin annulus around the perimeter of the mirror. It is good practice to confine the laser beam to the clear aperture, since nothing is known about the mirror's performance in the surrounding region. In addition, a beam that extends beyond the clear aperture risks being clipped by the edge of the mirror.
If the mirror's diameter is twice the beam's diameter, and the beam is perfectly centered on the mirror, the optical quality of the beam will be preserved and approximately all of the beam power will be reflected. However, any misalignment will impact beam quality. A larger mirror diameter provides additional flexibility during alignment and accommodates situations in which the beam is not perfectly centered in the clear aperture. Due to this, it can be more convenient to work with mirrors that have clear apertures at least a factor of three larger than the beam diameter.
Want additional Insights on beam alignment? Watch the full video.
Reference  Bahaa E. A. Saleh and Malvin Carl Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991) p. 85.
Figure 4: There are six possible sequences of reflections for a beam. The zone in which the first reflection occurs determines the sequence. These maps apply to beams approximately parallel with the retroreflector's normal axis. The beam paths are indcated by arrows, and dots mark reflections.
Figure 3: The three reflective faces of a corner-cube retroreflector are shown in false color and with numerical labels assigned to each half. Retroreflectors are designed to reflect an incident beam once from each face and provide an output beam parallel to the input.
Figure 6: Shifting the position of the first reflection to below the diagonal of the red face causes the next reflection to occur from the yellow face. After the third reflection, from the blue face, the beam exits the retroreflector travelling parallel to but shifted from the output beam in Figure 5.
Figure 5: When the first reflection occurs above the diagonal of the red face, and the beam is parallel to the retroreflector's normal axis, the second reflection occurs from the blue face. The beam then reflects from the yellow face before exiting the retroreflector.
Beams output from corner-cube retroreflectors travel parallel to the input beam, but in the opposite direction. The input beam can be aligned to the vertex or to a point on one of the three faces. The input and output beams are colinear if the input beam is aligned to the vertex. The two beams will be separated if the input beam spot does not overlap the vertex.
Input beams aligned to one of the retroreflector's faces will reflect from that face and then the other two before exiting the retroreflector. For a range of incident angles, there are six possibilities for the order in which the beam will reflect from the three different faces. lt can be useful to select the path through the retroreflector for reasons that include optimal beam positioning and minimizing polarization effects.
For a beam to follow a particular sequence of reflections, it is not sufficient to align the beam so that it is incident on a specific face. The beam must also be incident on the proper half of that face.
Tracing the Beam Path When looking into the vertex of the retroreflector, reflective effects make it possible to see the six halves of the three faces. Here, they are identified using dashed diagonal lines (Figure 3). In addition, the three faces of the retroreflector are shaded with false color for illustrative purposes. The normal axis is not shown, but it passes through the vertex and is equidistant from all three faces.
The six different possible reflection sequences can vary with angle of incidence. The maps in Figure 4 apply to beams nearly parallel with the normal axis. While a hollow retroreflector is used for these illustrations, these sequences of reflections also apply to prism retroreflecting mirrors.
The position of the first reflection determines which sequence of reflections the beam will follow through the retroreflector. The beam always exits from a different face than it entered.
Example Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the two orders of reflections that can occur when the first reflection occurs from the left-most vertical face. The incident beam is parallel to the retroreflector's normal axis.
When the first reflection occurs above the diagonal, as shown in Figure 5, the last reflection occurs from the horizontal (yellow) mirror. However, locating the first reflection below the diagonal results in a last reflection from the other vertical (blue) mirror. The output beams of these two cases are parallel to, but shifted from, one another.
Figure 8: Vertically polarized beams were input to a TIR solid prism retroreflector (PS975M) and a backside-gold-coated solid prism retroreflector (PS975M-M01B). The polarization ellipse of each output beam is shown in the zone that provided the beam's third reflection. For a plot of the ellipticity angle ( χ ) and orientation angles ( ψ ) with respect to the horizontal axis, click here.
Figure 7: Horizontally polarized beams were input to a TIR solid prism retroreflector (PS975M) and a backside-gold-coated solid prism retroreflector (PS975M-M01B). The polarization ellipse of each output beam is shown in the zone that provided the beam's third reflection. For a plot of the ellipticity angles ( ψ ) with respect to the horizontal axis, click here.
Figure 10: Retroreflectors convert some of the input light to the orthogonal polarization. Over 90% of the light output from the backside-gold-coated solid prism retroreflector (PS975M-M01B) remained polarized in the input state. In the case of the TIR solid prism retroreflector (PS975M), that percentage strongly depended on beam path and did not exceed 80%.
Figure 9: A retroreflector is designed to reflect an input beam once off of each face. When the beam is approximately normal to the viewing plane illustrated in Figures 7 and 8, the beam will follow one of six beam paths.
When the backsides of solid prism retroreflectors are coated with metal, polarization changes induced in the output beam are significantly reduced.
This is due to the difference between specular reflections, which occur from interfaces between glass and the higher refractive index metal, and reflections that occur due to total internal reflection (TIR), which require the backside material, like air, to have a lower refractive index.
Compared with TIR, a specular reflection from a glass-metal interface better preserves the input beam's polarization ellipticity.
Polarization and Beam Path Diagrams Beam paths through a retroreflector can be described by dividing its three reflective faces into six wedge-shaped zones (Figures 7, 8 and 9). Solid gray boundary lines mark physical lines of contact between reflective faces. Dotted gray lines indicate boundaries between the halves of each face.
The retroreflectors in these figures are oriented with one face-to-face interface aligned with the vertical axis. When the input beam is normal to these figures' viewing planes, Figure 9 describes the order in which the input beam reflects from the three faces before being output.
Output Polarization State Two sets of six measurements were made for both a PS975M TIR solid prism retroreflector and a PS975M-M01B backside-gold-coated solid prism retroreflector. Input light was linearly polarized, vertically for one set of measurements and horizontally for the other. In a set, each measurement was taken with the beam aligned to a different zone. At all three reflections, the beam was confined within a single zone.
In Figures 7 and 8, the polarization states of the output beam are represented using polarization ellipses. Each output beam's polarization ellipse is shown in the zone that provided the third reflection.
Ideally, the output beam would have the same polarization state as the input beam. However, these measurements indicate the retroreflectors converted some of the incident light to the orthogonal polarization. The plot in Figure 10 is a measure of the fraction of light in the output beam that was polarized parallel to the input.
The backside-gold-coated solid prism retroreflector was significantly more successful in maintaining the polarization state of these linearly polarized input beams.
Figure 12: Since the refractive indices of glass and air are different, the beam reflects at the front face. Reflected light can make multiple passes through the retroreflector before being output. Coherent overlapping beams produce interference effects.
Figure 11: The beam path through a corner-cube retroreflector includes a reflection from each of the three back faces, in an order determined by the position of the incident beam. The incident beam shown above has a 0° AOI and is displaced from the vertex.
The beam power output by solid prism retroreflectors may oscillate around an average value as the angle of incidence (AOI) varies. This is due to a multiple-beam interference effect that can occur when the coherence length of the light source is at least twice the optical path length through the retroreflector.
When the front face of a solid retroreflector has an anti-reflective coating, oscillation amplitudes for all AOIs are substantially reduced. Hollow metal-coated retroreflectors provide output beams whose power is approximately independent of AOI.
Beam Path These corner-cube retroreflectors provide an output beam that travels in a direction parallel and opposite to the incident beam. Figure 11 shows one beam path.
The AOI is determined using a reference axis normal to the front face of the retroreflector. This axis passes through the vertex and is equidistant from the three back faces.
Reflections from the Front Face As illustrated in Figure 12, light can make multiple passes through a solid prism retroreflector, depending on whether the light reflects from or is transmitted through interfaces between the front face and the surrounding medium.
When a glass retroreflector is surrounded by air, ~96% of the light is in the primary output beam, which makes a single pass through the retroreflector, and ~0.16% is in the beam that completes an additional round trip. In this work, light making additional round trips had negligible intensity.
Conditions for Interference Since the output of solid prism retroreflectors consists of beams that have travelled different optical path lengths, they will interfere if:
The beams overlap, which is more likely when the AOI of the incident beam is near 0° and the output is measured closer to the retroreflector. At larger distances, the beam deviation specified for the retroreflector and the AOI will more widely separate the first- and third-pass beams.
The coherence length of the source is longer than the difference in path length between the primary beam and the overlapping beam that has made more than one pass through the retroreflector.
Figure 14: Output power as a function of AOI differed depending on the type of corner-cube retroreflector. Data from measurements, made as described in Figure 13, were normalized to the same scale, and traces were vertically shifted as a visual aid. Oscillation amplitude was strongly suppressed when the front face was AR-coated (PS975-C). Oscillations were not observed for the hollow retroreflector (HRR201-M01).
Figure 13: The power output by a TIR solid prism retroreflector (PS975M) was measured as a function of AOI. The incident beam was provided by a DBR1064S 1064 nm laser source, whose coherence length was several meters. The largest-amplitude oscillations resulted around 0° AOI, where the first- and third-pass beams overlapped. The 1/e2 beam diameters did not overlap for AOIs larger than ±1° at a distance of 30 cm from the front face of the retroreflector.
Corner-Cube Retroreflectors Compared The variation of output power with small AOI was compared for four different types of corner-cube retroreflectors: a PS975M TIR solid prism retroreflector, a PS975M-M01B backside-gold-coated solid prism retroreflector, a PS975M-C TIR solid prism retroreflector with an antireflective-coated front face, and a HRR201-M01 that has a hollow construction. The input source was a DBR1064S 1064 nm laser diode with a coherence length of several meters, and the power detector was placed 30 cm from the front face of the retroreflectors. The beam size was small enough to ensure that each reflection occurred from a single face.
Figure 131 plots the normalized measurements made for the TIR solid prism retroreflector. As the AOI increased, the centers of the first- and third-pass beams shifted away from one another. At AOIs greater than around ±1°, the beams' 1/e2 diameters no longer overlapped. This resulted in the oscillation amplitude decreasing with AOI. The range of AOIs over which oscillations were significant would increase if the detector were located closer to the front face.
Figure 14 plots the trace from Figure 13, as well as traces measured for the other three retroreflectors, on the same scale but vertically shifted as a visual aid. These results indicate that an antireflective-coated front face suppresses power oscillations in beams output by solid prism retroreflectors. The power output by hollow retroreflectors does not oscillate, since there is no material boundary at the front face.
Figure 1: Visual C# and LabVIEW programs can be written to interrogate the DM713 Digital Micrometer. Examples are detailed in programming references available for download.
Programming references that provide introductions to communicating with the DM713 Digital Micrometer (Figure 1) are available. One reference has been developed for LabVIEW, and the other for Visual C#. Each reference includes a step-by-step discussion for writing the program, as well as a section that concisely provide the full program text without explanation.