Broadband AR Coating R<1.0% Average within Wavelength Range
Clear Aperture
90% of the Diameter
Features
UV Fused Silica Substrate
Ø1/2", Ø1", and Ø2" Sizes
Back Surface AR Coated to Minimize Ghosting
0.5° Wedged to Eliminate Interference Fringes
These beam samplers utilize the Fresnel reflection from an uncoated optical surface (indicated on the edge of the optic as shown on the Drawing tab) to pick off 1-10% of an incident beam, depending on the incident light's polarization. With a 45° angle of incidence and a P-Polarized light field, the beamsplitter will provide approximately 1% reflection, while an S-Polarized light field will provide approximately 10% reflection. See the Graphs tab for detailed plots of the reflectivity as a function of polarization and angle of incidence.
These laser-quality beamsplitters are typically used for monitoring applications where optical losses and wavefront distortions of the transmitted beam need to be kept to a minimum. The back surface is wedged to eliminate internal fringes and AR coated to minimize ghosting.
These beam samplers are fabricated from UV fused silica. They are recommended for applications that require minimal wavefront distortion over a larger operating temperature range. In addition, UV fused silica exhibits virtually no laser-induced fluorescence (as measured at 193 nm), making it an ideal choice for applications from the UV to the near IR.
Each UV Fused Silica Beam Sampler is available with one of the following broadband AR coatings: 250-420 nm (Designated with -UV), 350-700 nm (Designated with -A), 650-1050 nm (Designated as -B), or 1050-1620 nm (Designated as -C). These high-performance multilayer AR coatings are designed for angles of incidence between 0 and 30 degrees (0.5 NA). The plot shown below indicates the performance of the standard coatings in this family as a function of wavelength. Broadband coatings have a typical absorption of 0.25%, which is not shown in the reflectivity plots.
Loading...
Posted Comments:
Poster: wwbsghr
Posted Date: 2013-01-28 09:45:47.287
Dear Sir/Madam, I would like to know the damage threshold for BSF10-UV.Can it be used as sampler for 10Hz laser(283nm,50mj/pulse,D3mm;355nm,180mj/pulse,D5mm)?
Poster: bdada
Posted Date: 2012-03-15 11:21:00.0
Response from Buki at Thorlabs to zhgaom:
Thank you for participating in our feedback forum. The damage threshold for our UVFS beam samplers is 5J/cm^2 for an 810nm laser, 10ns, 10Hz, with spot size of 0.158mm. Based on the data you provided, our beam samplers should be suitable. Please test one and contact TechSupport@thorlabs.com if you experience any issues.
Poster: zhgaom
Posted Date: 2012-03-14 02:08:11.0
Dear Sir/Madam,
I would like to know the damage threshold for BSF5-UV and BSF5-A. We currently have two lasers. One is Nd:YAG working at 220mJ@532nm and 20mJ @266nm. The typical repetition rate is 5Hz. As the beam diameter is 5mm, it gives the power/energy density as and 5.5W/cm^2, 1.1J/cm^2, respectively. The other laser we have is a Nd:YLF laser working at 527nm, typical pulse energy is 25mJ@1000Hz. Would you have proper beam sampler so that I can sample those laser and monitor them using a energy meter?
Poster: Greg
Posted Date: 2010-11-16 10:22:46.0
A response from Greg at Thorlabs: We recently performed damage threshold testing for a number of our optics. Among the tested optics was a B coated UVFS beam sampler. At this time, this is the only beam sampler that has undergone damage threshold testing. As we continue damage threshold testing, we will add more values to our website. The 100 mJ/cm2 mentioned in a previous feedback was a very conservative estimate before we performed damage threshold testing. If you would like more information regarding a product, please contact techsupport@thorlabs.com and we will be able to assist you further.
Poster:
Posted Date: 2010-11-16 10:00:45.0
Is the damage threshold of the B coating (650-1050 nm) really higher than the others?
Actually, 100mJ/cm2 is mentioned in this post, whereas "5 J/cm2 (810 nm, 10 ns, 10 Hz)" is written for the B serie.
Poster: Adam
Posted Date: 2010-05-04 13:02:59.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs to Sunqingzhen: All of the beam samplers should contain an arrow that points towards the uncoated surface. Since the arrow is drawn on, it is possible that the arrow was rubbed away. In the future we will use our engraver to ensure this does not happen. If you would like to test which surface is the coated surface, we suggest one of the following approaches:
Use a magnifier and look from the edge of the substrate in and you can see where the coating begins. Or you can hold in your hand on a angle and reflect the ambient light and see the coated side.
If you have trouble locating this surface we can exchange the unit for you.
Poster: Adam
Posted Date: 2010-05-04 12:59:20.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs to sunqingzhen: The beam samplers do have an AR coating on the back surface that is meant to minimize the ghosting effect. Please note that this will not eliminate the ghosting effect especially for high power sources. I would like to contact you directly to get more information about your application.
Poster: sunqingzhen
Posted Date: 2010-05-03 23:20:07.0
I still have seen the ghosting, when the polarized laser is incident on the beam sampler at an angle of 45 degrees.
Poster: sunqingzhen
Posted Date: 2010-05-03 23:05:26.0
There is only a letter F on the sige of the beam sampler. Which is the AR coated surface?
I hadnt seen any arrow on the beam sampler!
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-10-20 16:12:59.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: There should also be an arrow on the side of this optic. This arrow will point to the Ar coated surface.
Poster: pmd
Posted Date: 2009-10-20 15:54:32.0
The only mark on the edge of the optic is a letter F. With this mark how can I tell which is the AR coated surface?
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-09-16 17:58:46.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: Currently we do not have beam splitters that can handle more power than 100mJ/cm^2. I will email you to try and get more information on the exact power of your Nd:Yag so I can find out if we can suggest any items that may work.
Poster: daniel.fink
Posted Date: 2009-09-16 17:45:52.0
Is there an alternative beam splitter which can handle more power than 100mJ/cm^2 as described below? What would you suggest for an 532nm ND:YAG laser? The splitted beam shall be used for power measurements and should have sth. like 5 to 10 % of the power. Thank you
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-07-14 18:22:00.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: We are able to supply custom wavelength beamsplitters, but would require more information before we provide a quotation. I will contact you directly to get this information.
Poster: hujianming
Posted Date: 2009-07-14 16:58:14.0
Can you supply a beamsplitter with 400-900nm wavelength? If ok,how about the price?
Thank you very much.
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-06-19 13:39:25.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: The damage threshold for these beamsamplers depend on the AR coatings. Currently, we can only provide an approximate damage threshold, which is 100W/cm^2 for CW laser and 100mJ/cm^2 for 10ns pulsed light. Please let me know if you have further questions.
Poster: walter.schmoll
Posted Date: 2009-06-19 09:45:56.0
How much power or pulse energy can these beam samplers handle?
Poster: Greg
Posted Date: 2009-03-23 15:19:33.0
A response from Greg at Thorlabs to dyanali: Thank you for your interest in our Beam Samplers. We have reflectivity data for these at 635 nm under the Graphs tab. We do not have data at 251 nm, but the reflection should be relatively consistent with the data at 635 nm.
Poster: dyanali
Posted Date: 2009-03-23 09:54:32.0
Hello,
What are the losses and reflectivity I can expect if I use one of the UVFS beam samplers to monitor a beam at 251nm?
Regards
Dyan
Poster: Laurie
Posted Date: 2008-03-31 16:05:32.0
Response from Laurie at Thorlabs to flickingerd: Thank you for noticing the typo under our specifications tab for the wedge angle. We have corrected that typo. As for the UV fused silica beam samplers, I have personally emailed you the theoretical reflectivity curve as a function of wavelength. Youll note that for 355 nm incident light, the average reflectivity for S and P polarized light incident at a 45 degree angle will be approximately 6%. Broadband coatings become more difficult to fabricate for shorter wavelengths; however, I have passed your suggestion for UV-coated beam samplers on to our optics engineers so that they can consider producing them in the future. Thank you for your interest in our products!
Poster: flickingerd
Posted Date: 2008-03-31 13:20:50.0
While Im at it, the wedge angle spec for the beam samplers (under the Specs tab) is written incorrectly, I think. Its written 30[deg] +/- 10 Arc Min, where [deg] is the little circle. The little circle should probably be replaced by a single quote, or the words "Arc Min" to avoid confusion.
Poster: flickingerd
Posted Date: 2008-03-31 13:11:53.0
About the UV fused silica beam samplers (BSF): why would you not offer your UV AR coating on your UV fused silica beam samplers? I would like one with the UV AR coating for use with a UV laser, but its probably not worth the wait to have one specially made right now. If you could email me the reflection off of the "A" coating for 355nm for now, that would be nice.
Poster: technicalmarketing
Posted Date: 2008-01-23 09:36:42.0
Dear Europe,
The laser windows are more expensive than the beam samplers because they have better scratch/dig specifications, they are coated on both sides, and the specialty coatings combined with the smaller production runs increase the cost per coating.
Poster: europe
Posted Date: 2008-01-22 10:16:40.0
Why are the Laser Windows (e.g. WG11050) more expensive than the beam samplers? Surface specs and product is nearly the same - and the sampler got even a wedge...?
Click on any phrase below to search our site using our new Search Engine: