Our US offices will be closed Saturday, May 25th through Monday, May 27th in observance of the Memorial Day holiday. We will reopen on Tuesday, May 28th at 8 AM EST.
Available Lengths: 1.5" (38 mm), 2" (50 mm), 3" (75 mm), and 4" (100 mm)
Imperial and Metric Locking Options Available
These Ø1" Post Holders are the ideal solution for mounting optical components when a specific height has not been determined. Our line of Ø1" Posts covers a range of fixed heights; however, these post holders allow more height flexibility while still using our Ø1" stainless steel posts. The stability provided by the RSH series of post holders is equivalent to that provided by either directly threading the post into the optical table or by utilizing a pedestal post with a clamping fork. A taller post holder should be used with a longer post in order to obtain the greatest stability. Please see the Stability Tab for more information.
The flexure design supports the post in a clamping mechanism that is secured with an 8-32 (M4) cap screw. The bore has two grooves: a circular groove and a square groove. The circular groove allows the metal to flex and clamp the post's position without breaking. The square groove provides two fixed contact lines for the post to ensure it will always be locked into the same place. These post holders have a pedestal base and can be easily secured to a breadboard or optical table using the PF175 clamping fork.
The stability of the Ø1" post mounted in an RSH flexure post holder was compared to that of a post directly threaded to a breadboard as well as one utilized with a pedestal base and secured to a breadboard with a clamp. The setup (shown to the right) consisted of an RS6 post held in an RSH post holder that was clamped to an optical table with a PF175 clamping fork. A moment arm was clamped to the post, and a load was applied to the end of the arm. As varying loads were applied to the moment arm, the deflection of the post was measured with a dial indicator that provided 0.001" accuracy. The experiement was then repeated for the a directly mounted post and the post mounted to the breadboard with the use of a pedestal base and clamping fork. The graph below displays the results.
The test results indicate the RSH post holder is not significantly less stable then the other two mounting options. However, when a shorter post holder was used with a longer post, the system was less stable. We recommend that you use a taller post holder with taller posts to avoid stability loss.
Loading...
Posted Comments:
Poster: sharrell
Posted Date: 2012-06-21 13:54:00.0
Response from Sean at Thorlabs to Last Two Posters: Thank you for your feedback on our new Ø1" Post Holders! We have indeed updated the graph on the "Stability" Tab. The original version showed two sets of data using the new post holders: a 6" long post in a 2" long post holder, and a 6" long post in a 1.5" long post holder. We do not recommend using such a short post holder for this length of post, and it was our hope that this would be clear from the plot. Based on your comment, we decided to show only recommended mounting options in the plot. In addition, we are reviewing the text on this tab to be sure that the test parameters and the recommended mounting options are clear.
Poster:
Posted Date: 2012-06-21 13:16:42.0
Much better now.
Poster: Saleau
Posted Date: 2012-06-21 04:03:03.0
Your deflection graph is strange. If I believe it then I should not buy this post holder since the usual mounting is better. Do you not wish to sell these?
Click on any phrase below to search our site using our new Search Engine:
The PF175 clamping fork secures the RSH post holders to any breadboard or optical table.This clamping fork create three points of contact with the table for high stability.
Please note that significant overtightening of clamping forks can deform the surface of an optical table, which can cause misalignment of components and decrease stability of the clamping fork.