Our US offices will be closed Saturday, May 25th through Monday, May 27th in observance of the Memorial Day holiday. We will reopen on Tuesday, May 28th at 8 AM EST.
*Please see the Graphs tab to download transmission data.
Features
10 Different Diameters Available
Available Uncoated or with One of Two AR Coatings
Offers Higher NA and Less Spherical Aberration than Spherical Lenses
High Efficiency Illumination Applications
Light Collection
Projection
Detection
Condensing
The ACL Series of Aspheric Condenser Lenses is ideal for high-efficiency illumination applications. Compared to spherical lenses, this series introduces fewer aberrations, offers larger apertures, and provides lower f/# ratios. These aspheric condenser lenses are designed for collimating light from a lamp, LED, or similar light source; for best performance in this application, the plano side of the lens should face the source.
For imaging or other demanding applications, we recommend our Large-Diameter Aspheres, which offer diffraction-limited performance at their design wavelength.
These lenses are available in ten diameters, offering more flexibility for the design of your optical system. The aspheric surface is precision molded on the aspheric side and ground and polished on the plano side.
Antireflection-Coated Versions These aspheric condenser lenses are available uncoated for use in the 380 - 2100 nm range or with an AR coating for the 350 to 700 nm (-A Coating) or 650 to 1050 nm (-B Coating) range. Please see the Reflectivity curve for the coated versions on the Graphs Tab.
Application Idea
One application for condenser lenses is to modify or manipulate light from LEDs. The picture below shows a pair of condenser lenses each mounted in an SCL03 Self-Centering Lens Mount. The light from a Mounted LED (right) passes to the left through the first condenser lens, then a diffuser, and finally through the second condenser lens.
Item #
Diameter (mm)
f (mm)
f/#*
Clear Aperture (mm)
fb (mm)
Numerical Aperture
Center Thickness (mm)
Edge Thickness (mm)
Non-Aspheric Surface
Reference Drawing
ACL108
10
8
0.8
>90%
4.2
0.547
5.8
2.0
Plano
ACL1210
12
10.5
0.88
>90%
6.7
0.545
5.8
2.0
Plano
ACL1512
15
12
0.8
>90%
6.7
0.546
8.0
2.4
Plano
ACL1815
18
15
0.83
>90%
10.5
0.534
6.8
2.5
Plano
ACL2018
20
18
0.9
>90%
12.7
0.488
8.0
1.8
Plano
ACL2520
25
20
0.8
>90%
12.1
0.543
12.0
2.8
Plano
ACL3026
30
26.5
0.88
>90%
19.3
0.522
11.0
3.0
Plano
ACL4532
45
32
0.71
>90%
20.9
0.612
18.5
2.2
Spherical Convex
ACL5040
50
40
0.8
>90%
26.2
0.554
21.0
2.6
Plano
ACL7560
75
60
0.8
>90%
40.3
0.619
30.0
2.3
Plano
*Approximate f/# for the lens obtained by dividing the focal length of the lens by its diameter. Note that this will be an underestimate of the true f/# since the condenser lens cannot be used over its entire diameter.
Item #
ACL108
ACL1210
ACL1512
ACL1815
ACL2018
ACL2520
ACL3026
ACL4532*
ACL5040
ACL7560
c=1/R
1/4.18464
1/5.49234
1/6.27696
1/7.72481
1/9.41544
1/10.4616
1/13.8595
1/18.280674
1/20.923201
1/31.384801
k
-0.602689
-0.623014
-0.613902
-1.0
-0.639158
-0.626528
-1.0
-1.0
-0.640512
-1.911446
A2
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.9E-6
-
-
-
A4
2.21E-4
8.7E-5
6.8E-5
6.5E-3
1.7E-5
1.5E-5
1.5E-7
2.0E-6
2.0E-6
5.0E-6
A6
-
-
-
2.8E-4
-
-
1.3E-9
-
-
-
*S2 radius is 130 mm. All other Aspheric Condenser Lenses on this page have a plano S2.
Response from Jeremy at Thorlabs: Using our M365L2 LED, the divergence would be about 2-3° or so (full angle).
Poster: Andreas.Buck
Posted Date: 2012-07-31 03:34:24.0
What degree of collimation is achieveable with the ACL5040? How big is the divergence using an LED like M365?
Poster: tcohen
Posted Date: 2012-02-22 13:12:00.0
Response from Tim at Thorlabs to kmurphy: Thank you for contacting us. I have emailed you the Zemax file. If you need any more information, please feel free to contact us.
Poster: kmurphy
Posted Date: 2012-02-22 11:22:04.0
I would also like the zemax files for these lenses, specifically for ACL1512. Thank you
Poster:
Posted Date: 2011-11-30 07:35:33.0
A response from Tyler at Thorlabs: We will email you the zemax file immeadiately. Please let us know if you have any other needs.
Poster: mvirgen
Posted Date: 2011-11-29 13:27:04.0
I was wondering if i can get the zemax model for this. I have checked and updated the zemax catalog (from your website) and its not included. Thank you.
Poster: alee
Posted Date: 2011-09-29 11:44:28.0
could you put up the the transmission curves for these please, is the A coating suitable for use with one of your 385nm LED's? the A coating graph suggests it is but the substrate transmision is stated at 380, which sounds a little close to the edge.
regards
Andrew
Poster: sharrell
Posted Date: 2011-09-29 08:44:00.0
A Response from Sean at Thorlabs to Andrew: Thank you for your feedback. We have added the B270 transmission curve, as well as a link to download the transmission data in an Excel spreadsheet. This may be found on the Graphs tab.
Poster: jjurado
Posted Date: 2011-08-31 17:43:00.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to john.a.smith: The 4th order coefficient of the ACL2520 specified in the drawing is +1.5E-5. This information also agrees with the zmx model for this lens. I will contact you directly for further support.
Poster: john.a.smith
Posted Date: 2011-08-29 18:34:21.0
Specifications and coefficients for this aspheric lens dont seem consistent according to Zemax. Is the 4th order coefficient for the ACL2520 equal to -1.5e-5, not +1.5e-5?
Thanks!
John
Poster: Thorlabs
Posted Date: 2010-12-01 15:42:32.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to Edgar: I will work with our web team on updating this page with ZEMAX files for the aspheric condenser lenses. In the meantime, I will send you the zmx file for the ACL2520.
Poster: edgar.guevara
Posted Date: 2010-11-30 18:09:24.0
Can you post the full prescription data for ZEMAX, I think it would be very useful for all the users. I am trying to collimate the light from a LED, but I do not know if this aspheric (ACL2520) is enough.
Poster: Thorlabs
Posted Date: 2010-10-11 14:06:22.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to saxena.a: We would recommnend using the AL2520-A large diameter aspheric lens for this purpose. This lens, designed for diffraction-limited performance, has a better collection efficiency and better resolution than its ACL counterpart.
Poster: Thorlabs
Posted Date: 2010-07-07 08:28:15.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to mrubioroy: thank you for your reply. The easiest way to determine where the principal planes are for this lens is by ray tracing. For this purpose, it is important to know the wavelength(s) that you are working at, since Snells law needs to be applied, and we would need to know the index of refraction of the lens material at the operating wavelength. Also, beam diameter needs to be considered. I will contact you directly to work out all these details.
Poster: mrubioroy
Posted Date: 2010-06-09 12:22:40.0
Response to Javier: I guess my question should be: Can I know where the principal planes are?
Poster: Javier
Posted Date: 2010-06-08 04:24:57.0
Response from Javier at Thorlabs to mrubio: for a thin lens, the effective focal length can be considered as being measured from the center of the lens to the focal point. However, for a thick lens such as the ACL2520, the focal length is measured from one of the pricipal planes, which are basically defined as hypothetical planes were all the refraction is considered to happen. The thin lens equation can be used, but it disregards the distance between these planes. Gullstrands equation takes this distance into account, but the calculation process can get very involved. So, although the answer is not straightforward, you can consider the effective focal length as being measured a few millimiters from the convex surface of the lens. I will contact you directly in case you would like to discuss this further. Regarding your question about back focal length, you are correct; it is measured from the flat, or plano, side.
Poster: mrubio
Posted Date: 2010-06-07 16:20:13.0
From where is the EFL of 20mm on ACL2520 measured? Is the back focal distance measured from the flat side?
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-11-02 08:15:02.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: I will send you all of the aspheric lens data that you will need.
Poster: dinesharakere
Posted Date: 2009-11-02 03:36:18.0
Sir,
We had optimized our setup using AL108 and AL1210 combination for a Fluorescence detection (non-imaging application) setup. During websearch can find ACL108 and ACL 1210, which are much cheaper.
Can I please have the aspheric lens prescription data - so that I can verify in Zemax that whether the alternate and cheaper substitute can meet the previous design performance.
Poster: klee
Posted Date: 2009-10-12 14:08:37.0
A response from Ken at Thorlabs: You are correct that the flat side should be facing the focus and the curved side should be facing collimation. We will correct this shortly.
Poster: thorlabs
Posted Date: 2009-10-09 21:28:01.0
Is the setup shown here correct?
The Aspheric Condenser Lenses page shows two condenser lenses with curved faces toward each other. As I look at your picture, I see collimated light to the left and to the right of the pair (external to the pair) and light focused to a point between the pair. Normally the flat side of the lens faces toward focus and the curved side faces toward collimation.
Poster: apalmentieri
Posted Date: 2009-08-14 16:15:04.0
A response from Adam at Thorlabs: I understand your concerns and will send you all of the prescription information we currently can provide. I will also speak with our technical marketing department about adding this information to our website.
Poster: erik.foerster
Posted Date: 2009-08-14 04:15:33.0
For an optic designer it is imported to know the full description of the optical surfaces. Otherwise this product-information is really void.
Click on any phrase below to search our site using our new Search Engine: